A New Haplotype-resolved Turkey Genome to Enable Turkey Genetics and Genomics Research

Overview

Journal Gigascience

Publisher Oxford University Press

Specialties Biology
Genetics

Date 2023 Jul 25

PMID 37489751

Authors

Carolina P Barros

Martijn F L Derks

Jeff Mohr

Benjamin J Wood

Richard P M A Crooijmans

Hendrik-Jan Megens

Marco C A M Bink

Martien A M Groenen

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: The domesticated turkey (Meleagris gallopavo) is a species of significant agricultural importance and is the second largest contributor, behind broiler chickens, to world poultry meat production. The previous genome is of draft quality and partly based on the chicken (Gallus gallus) genome. A high-quality reference genome of M. gallopavo is essential for turkey genomics and genetics research and the breeding industry.

Results: By adopting the trio-binning approach, we were able to assemble a high-quality chromosome-level F1 assembly and 2 parental haplotype assemblies, leveraging long-read technologies and genome-wide chromatin interaction data (Hi-C). From a total of 40 chromosomes (2n = 80), we captured 35 chromosomes in a single scaffold, showing much improved genome completeness and continuity compared to the old assembly build. The 3 assemblies are of higher quality than the previous draft quality assembly and comparable to the chicken assemblies (GRCg7) shown by the largest contig N50 (26.6 Mb) and comparable BUSCO gene set completeness scores (96-97%). Comparative analyses confirm a previously identified large inversion of around 19 Mbp on the Z chromosome not found in other Galliformes. Structural variation between the parent haplotypes was identified, which poses potential new target genes for breeding.

Conclusions: We contribute a new high-quality turkey genome at the chromosome level, benefiting turkey genetics and other avian genomics research as well as the turkey breeding industry.

Citing Articles

Genomic evidence for hybridization and introgression between blue peafowl and endangered green peafowl and molecular foundation of leucistic plumage of blue peafowl.

Wang G, Zhang X, Zhao X, Ren X, Chen A, Dai W Gigascience. 2025; 14.

PMID: 39965774 PMC: 11835448. DOI: 10.1093/gigascience/giae124.

Genome Wide Identification of Structure Variations in Five Italian Turkey Populations.

Saleh M, Landi V, Derks M, Centoducati G, Groenen M, De Palo P Animals (Basel). 2025; 15(3).

PMID: 39943109 PMC: 11816156. DOI: 10.3390/ani15030339.

A chromosome-level, haplotype-resolved genome assembly and annotation for the Eurasian minnow (Leuciscidae: Phoxinus phoxinus) provide evidence of haplotype diversity.

Oriowo T, Chrysostomakis I, Martin S, Kukowka S, Brown T, Winkler S Gigascience. 2025; 14.

PMID: 39877992 PMC: 11775470. DOI: 10.1093/gigascience/giae116.

Transposable elements shape the landscape of heterozygous structural variation in a bird genome.

Li B, Kang N, Xu Z, Luo H, Fan S, Ao X Zool Res. 2025; 46(1):75-86.

PMID: 39846188 PMC: 11891004. DOI: 10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2024.237.

Genomic scans for selection and runs of homozygosity in southern Italian turkey populations.

Saleh M, Landi V, Derks M, Centoducati G, Groenen M, De Palo P Poult Sci. 2025; 104(2):104750.

PMID: 39827693 PMC: 11787592. DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2024.104750.

References

Shen Q, Peng M, Adeola A, Kui L, Duan S, Miao Y . Genomic Analyses of Unveil Helmeted Guinea Fowl (Numida meleagris) Domestication in West Africa. Genome Biol Evol. 2021; 13(6). PMC: 8214406. DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evab090. View

Cauchi R . SMN and Gemins: 'we are family' … or are we?: insights into the partnership between Gemins and the spinal muscular atrophy disease protein SMN. Bioessays. 2010; 32(12):1077-89. DOI: 10.1002/bies.201000088. View

Okonechnikov K, Conesa A, Garcia-Alcalde F . Qualimap 2: advanced multi-sample quality control for high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2015; 32(2):292-4. PMC: 4708105. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv566. View

Goel M, Sun H, Jiao W, Schneeberger K . SyRI: finding genomic rearrangements and local sequence differences from whole-genome assemblies. Genome Biol. 2019; 20(1):277. PMC: 6913012. DOI: 10.1186/s13059-019-1911-0. View

Zhang G, Li C, Li Q, Li B, Larkin D, Lee C . Comparative genomics reveals insights into avian genome evolution and adaptation. Science. 2014; 346(6215):1311-20. PMC: 4390078. DOI: 10.1126/science.1251385. View

Matzke A, Varga F, Gruendler P, Unfried I, Berger H, Mayr B . Characterization of a new repetitive sequence that is enriched on microchromosomes of turkey. Chromosoma. 1992; 102(1):9-14. DOI: 10.1007/BF00352284. View

Ruan J, Li H . Fast and accurate long-read assembly with wtdbg2. Nat Methods. 2019; 17(2):155-158. PMC: 7004874. DOI: 10.1038/s41592-019-0669-3. View

Li H, Durbin R . Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2009; 25(14):1754-60. PMC: 2705234. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324. View

Bonfield J, Marshall J, Danecek P, Li H, Ohan V, Whitwham A . HTSlib: C library for reading/writing high-throughput sequencing data. Gigascience. 2021; 10(2). PMC: 7931820. DOI: 10.1093/gigascience/giab007. View

10.

Dalloul R, Long J, Zimin A, Aslam L, Beal K, Blomberg L . Multi-platform next-generation sequencing of the domestic turkey (Meleagris gallopavo): genome assembly and analysis. PLoS Biol. 2010; 8(9). PMC: 2935454. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000475. View

11.

Shibusawa M, Nishibori M, Nishida-Umehara C, Tsudzuki M, Masabanda J, Griffin D . Karyotypic evolution in the Galliformes: an examination of the process of karyotypic evolution by comparison of the molecular cytogenetic findings with the molecular phylogeny. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2004; 106(1):111-9. DOI: 10.1159/000078570. View

12.

Kapusta A, Suh A . Evolution of bird genomes-a transposon's-eye view. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2016; 1389(1):164-185. DOI: 10.1111/nyas.13295. View

13.

Aslam M, Bastiaansen J, Crooijmans R, Vereijken A, Megens H, Groenen M . A SNP based linkage map of the turkey genome reveals multiple intrachromosomal rearrangements between the turkey and chicken genomes. BMC Genomics. 2010; 11:647. PMC: 3091770. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-647. View

14.

Waters P, Patel H, Ruiz-Herrera A, Alvarez-Gonzalez L, Lister N, Simakov O . Microchromosomes are building blocks of bird, reptile, and mammal chromosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021; 118(45). PMC: 8609325. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2112494118. View

15.

OConnor R, Kiazim L, Skinner B, Fonseka G, Joseph S, Jennings R . Patterns of microchromosome organization remain highly conserved throughout avian evolution. Chromosoma. 2018; 128(1):21-29. PMC: 6394684. DOI: 10.1007/s00412-018-0685-6. View

16.

Bult C, Blake J, Smith C, Kadin J, Richardson J . Mouse Genome Database (MGD) 2019. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018; 47(D1):D801-D806. PMC: 6323923. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gky1056. View

17.

Wang Y, Tang H, DeBarry J, Tan X, Li J, Wang X . MCScanX: a toolkit for detection and evolutionary analysis of gene synteny and collinearity. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012; 40(7):e49. PMC: 3326336. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkr1293. View

18.

Warren W, Clayton D, Ellegren H, Arnold A, Hillier L, Kunstner A . The genome of a songbird. Nature. 2010; 464(7289):757-62. PMC: 3187626. DOI: 10.1038/nature08819. View

19.

Durand N, Shamim M, Machol I, Rao S, Huntley M, Lander E . Juicer Provides a One-Click System for Analyzing Loop-Resolution Hi-C Experiments. Cell Syst. 2016; 3(1):95-8. PMC: 5846465. DOI: 10.1016/j.cels.2016.07.002. View

20.

Ghurye J, Pop M, Koren S, Bickhart D, Chin C . Scaffolding of long read assemblies using long range contact information. BMC Genomics. 2017; 18(1):527. PMC: 5508778. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-017-3879-z. View