» Articles » PMID: 37483420

Knowledge, Information, and Data Readiness Levels (KaRLs) for Risk Assessment, Communication, and Governance of Nano-, New, and Other Advanced Materials

Overview
Journal Glob Chall
Date 2023 Jul 24
PMID 37483420
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The obvious benefits derived from the increasing use of engineered nano-, new, and advanced materials and associated products have to be weighed out by a governance process against their possible risks. Differences in risk perception (beliefs about potential harm) among stakeholders, in particular nonscientists, and low transparency of the underlying decision processes can lead to a lack of support and acceptance of nano-, new, and other advanced material enabled products. To integrate scientific outcomes with stakeholders needs, this work develops a new approach comprising a nine-level, stepwise categorization and guidance system entitled "Knowledge, Information, and Data Readiness Levels" (KaRLs), analogous to the NASA Technology Readiness Levels. The KaRL system assesses the type, extent, and usability of the available data, information, and knowledge and integrates the participation of relevant and interested stakeholders in a cocreation/codesign process to improve current risk assessment, communication, and governance. The novelty of the new system is to communicate and share all available and relevant elements on material related risks in a user/stakeholder-friendly, transparent, flexible, and holistic way and so stimulate reflection, awareness, communication, and a deeper understanding that ultimately enables the discursive process that is needed for the sustainable risk governance of new materials.

Citing Articles

Knowledge, Information, and Data Readiness Levels (KaRLs) for Risk Assessment, Communication, and Governance of Nano-, New, and Other Advanced Materials.

Drobne D, Ciornii D, Hodoroaba V, Bohmer N, Novak S, Kranjc E Glob Chall. 2023; 7(7):2200211.

PMID: 37483420 PMC: 10362106. DOI: 10.1002/gch2.202200211.

References
1.
Klinke A, Renn O . The Coming of Age of Risk Governance. Risk Anal. 2019; 41(3):544-557. DOI: 10.1111/risa.13383. View

2.
Kiker G, Bridges T, Varghese A, Seager P, Linkov I . Application of multicriteria decision analysis in environmental decision making. Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2006; 1(2):95-108. DOI: 10.1897/IEAM_2004a-015.1. View

3.
Wilkinson M, Dumontier M, Aalbersberg I, Appleton G, Axton M, Baak A . The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci Data. 2016; 3:160018. PMC: 4792175. DOI: 10.1038/sdata.2016.18. View

4.
Ribeiro B, Smith R, Millar K . A Mobilising Concept? Unpacking Academic Representations of Responsible Research and Innovation. Sci Eng Ethics. 2016; 23(1):81-103. DOI: 10.1007/s11948-016-9761-6. View

5.
Kraegeloh A, Suarez-Merino B, Sluijters T, Micheletti C . Implementation of Safe-by-Design for Nanomaterial Development and Safe Innovation: Why We Need a Comprehensive Approach. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2018; 8(4). PMC: 5923569. DOI: 10.3390/nano8040239. View