» Articles » PMID: 37471296

Prophylactic Therapy for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection After Extraction of Third Molar: An Overview of Reviews

Overview
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2023 Jul 20
PMID 37471296
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: To compare the effect of different prophylactic therapies on prevention of surgical site infection after extraction of third molars with different degree of impaction.

Material And Methods: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses evaluating the effect of different prophylactic therapies on prevention of surgical site infection after extraction of third molars were included. An electronic search was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic reviews. AMSTAR 2 tool was used to evaluate the confidence in results from the included reviews. Descriptive analyses were performed.

Results: Six reviews were included. A significant benefit of different antibiotics to the prevention of site infection after extraction of third molars was reported. Amoxicillin/amoxicillin clavulanic acid could significantly reduce the rate of surgical site infection versus placebo. Chlorhexidine gel could significantly reduce the frequency of alveolar osteitis versus placebo.

Conclusions: Based on the limited evidence, there is a significant benefit of prophylactic therapy while the comparative effect of different types of prophylactic regimes are controversial.

Citing Articles

Effect of Antibiotics on Clinical and Laboratory Outcomes After Mandibular Third Molar Surgery: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial.

Soleymani F, Mate Sanchez de Val J, Lijnev A, Makiabadi M, Perez-Albacete Martinez C Antibiotics (Basel). 2025; 14(2).

PMID: 40001438 PMC: 11852146. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics14020195.


The Use of Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF) in the Management of Dry Socket: A Systematic Review.

Laforgia A, Inchingolo A, Riccaldo L, Avantario P, Buongiorno S, Malcangi G Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(18).

PMID: 39337554 PMC: 11432458. DOI: 10.3390/ijms251810069.

References
1.
Amaliya A, Ramadhanti R, Hadikrishna I, Maulina T . The Effectiveness of 0.2% Chlorhexidine Gel on Early Wound Healing after Tooth Extraction: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Eur J Dent. 2022; 16(3):688-694. PMC: 9507567. DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1739544. View

2.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D . Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009; 6(7):e1000097. PMC: 2707599. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097. View

3.
Shea B, Reeves B, Wells G, Thuku M, Hamel C, Moran J . AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ. 2017; 358:j4008. PMC: 5833365. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.j4008. View

4.
Milic T, Raidoo P, Gebauer D . Antibiotic prophylaxis in oral and maxillofacial surgery: a systematic review. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021; 59(6):633-642. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2020.09.020. View

5.
Supranoto S, Slot D, Addy M, Van der Weijden G . The effect of chlorhexidine dentifrice or gel versus chlorhexidine mouthwash on plaque, gingivitis, bleeding and tooth discoloration: a systematic review. Int J Dent Hyg. 2014; 13(2):83-92. DOI: 10.1111/idh.12078. View