» Articles » PMID: 28526078

The Efficacy of Chlorhexidine Gel in the Prevention of Alveolar Osteitis After Mandibular Third Molar Extraction: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal BMC Oral Health
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2017 May 21
PMID 28526078
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Alveolar osteitis is a very painful and distressing condition for a patient who has recently undergone a tooth extraction and has led dental professionals to search for preventive measures. The aim of this meta-analysis to determine the effect of chlorhexidine (CHX) gel on the incidence of alveolar osteitis after mandibular third molar extraction.

Methods: Studies were searched for on electronic search engines using Medline (PubMed), Cochrane central, Scopus and advanced Google Scholar from May 2015 to December 2015. Randomized controlled trial studies with a history of mandibular third molar extraction, along with the administration of topical chlorhexidine gel were included. The risk of bias of the selected articles was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool. RevMan 5.3 Software was used to analyze the pooled effect. I was calculated to determine heterogeneity and a funnel plot was used to check the risk of bias. Subgroup analysis was also done based on the presence of confounding factors (smoking, oral contraceptive etc.) and on split mouth design.

Results: Out of 52 articles, ten met the inclusion criteria. 862 participants were involved in the selected studies with a mean age range from 24.15 ± 5.02 to 36.65 ± 11. The overall RR was 0.43 (95% CI: 0.32, 0.58, p < 0.00001). Three studies used a split-mouth design to check the effect of chlorhexidine gel in the prevention of alveolar osteitis incidence. There was a pooled effect of 0.29 (95% CI: 0.16, 0.50) for the intervention group in the split mouth design studies. A stratified analysis was done to check the effect of CHX gel in patients with confounding factors and a significant reduction of AO incidence was found; 0.60 (95% CI: 0.41, 0.87; p = 0.05) in the intervention. There was no reported adverse reaction. The heterogeneity (I) was 40%. The funnel plot showed that there was no significant publication bias.

Conclusion: This meta-analysis suggests that CHX gel is superior to a placebo in reducing the incidence of alveolar osteitis after mandibular third molar extraction.

Citing Articles

Prevalence and Factors Influencing Post-Operative Complications following Tooth Extraction: A Narrative Review.

Dignam P, Elshafey M, Jeganathan A, Foo M, Park J, Ratnaweera M Int J Dent. 2024; 2024:7712829.

PMID: 38756385 PMC: 11098612. DOI: 10.1155/2024/7712829.


Green tea and hyaluronic acid gel enhance fibroblast activation and improves the gingival healing post-third molar extraction.

Bonatto M, da Silva Feltran G, Barbosa T, Pereira D, Santos S, Mendes P Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):7124.

PMID: 38531928 PMC: 10965904. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-57821-5.


Efficacy of Chlorhexidine after Oral Surgery Procedures on Wound Healing: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Romero-Olid M, Bucataru E, Ramos-Garcia P, Gonzalez-Moles M Antibiotics (Basel). 2023; 12(10).

PMID: 37887254 PMC: 10604691. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics12101552.


Prophylactic therapy for prevention of surgical site infection after extraction of third molar: An overview of reviews.

Cao Y, Jiang Q, Hu J Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2023; 28(6):e581-e587.

PMID: 37471296 PMC: 10635635. DOI: 10.4317/medoral.25999.


Brazilian dental consensus on dental management in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation - Part I - pre-HSCT.

Correa M, Granzotto F, Innocentini L, Reis T, de Lima E, Varanda R Hematol Transfus Cell Ther. 2023; 45(3):358-367.

PMID: 37295969 PMC: 10499583. DOI: 10.1016/j.htct.2023.04.001.


References
1.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D . Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009; 151(4):264-9, W64. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135. View

2.
Oginni F, Fatusi O, Alagbe A . A clinical evaluation of dry socket in a Nigerian teaching hospital. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003; 61(8):871-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0278-2391(03)00248-9. View

3.
Ren Y, Malmstrom H . Effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis in third molar surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007; 65(10):1909-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2007.03.004. View

4.
Jaafar N, Nor G . The prevalence of post-extraction complications in an outpatient dental clinic in Kuala Lumpur Malaysia--a retrospective survey. Singapore Dent J. 2001; 23(1):24-8. View

5.
MacGregor A . Aetiology of dry socket: a clinical investigation. Br J Oral Surg. 1968; 6(1):49-58. DOI: 10.1016/s0007-117x(68)80026-5. View