Ten Simple Rules for Scientists Engaging in Science Communication

Overview

Journal PLoS Comput Biol

Specialty Biology

Date 2023 Jul 20

PMID 37471282

Authors

Brittney G Borowiec

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Citing Articles

Examination of public perceptions of microbes and microbiomes in the United States reveals insights for science communication.

Kokkinias K, Pruneski K, Wrighton K, Kelp N PLoS One. 2024; 19(10):e0312427.

PMID: 39432547 PMC: 11493282. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312427.

Ten simple rules for successfully carrying out funded research projects.

Forero D, Curioso W, Wang W PLoS Comput Biol. 2024; 20(9):e1012431.

PMID: 39298382 PMC: 11412653. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012431.

Ten simple rules for successfully managing EU research grants.

Pina D PLoS Comput Biol. 2024; 20(8):e1012335.

PMID: 39146241 PMC: 11326557. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012335.

A Creative Communication Partnership to Promote Curricula Dissemination on Social Media.

Lesiak A, Malik N, Griswold J J STEM Outreach. 2024; 7(1).

PMID: 38549949 PMC: 10977048.

Communicating Nutritional Knowledge to the Chinese Public: Examining Predictive Factors of User Engagement on TikTok in China.

Zhu M, Che S Behav Sci (Basel). 2024; 14(3).

PMID: 38540504 PMC: 10968627. DOI: 10.3390/bs14030201.

References

Dahlstrom M . Using narratives and storytelling to communicate science with nonexpert audiences. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014; 111 Suppl 4:13614-20. PMC: 4183170. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1320645111. View

Kucharski A . Ten simple rules for writing a popular science book. PLoS Comput Biol. 2018; 14(2):e1005808. PMC: 5794074. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005808. View

Brownell S, Price J, Steinman L . Science Communication to the General Public: Why We Need to Teach Undergraduate and Graduate Students this Skill as Part of Their Formal Scientific Training. J Undergrad Neurosci Educ. 2013; 12(1):E6-E10. PMC: 3852879. View

Bullock O, Colon Amill D, Shulman H, Dixon G . Jargon as a barrier to effective science communication: Evidence from metacognition. Public Underst Sci. 2019; 28(7):845-853. DOI: 10.1177/0963662519865687. View

Cheplygina V, Hermans F, Albers C, Bielczyk N, Smeets I . Ten simple rules for getting started on Twitter as a scientist. PLoS Comput Biol. 2020; 16(2):e1007513. PMC: 7010239. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007513. View

Rakedzon T, Segev E, Chapnik N, Yosef R, Baram-Tsabari A . Automatic jargon identifier for scientists engaging with the public and science communication educators. PLoS One. 2017; 12(8):e0181742. PMC: 5549884. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181742. View

Lackey R . Science, scientists, and policy advocacy. Conserv Biol. 2007; 21(1):12-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00639.x. View

Sharon A, Baram-Tsabari A . Measuring mumbo jumbo: A preliminary quantification of the use of jargon in science communication. Public Underst Sci. 2013; 23(5):528-46. DOI: 10.1177/0963662512469916. View

Willoughby S, Johnson K, Sterman L . Quantifying scientific jargon. Public Underst Sci. 2020; 29(6):634-643. DOI: 10.1177/0963662520937436. View

10.

Mathews D, Kalfoglou A, Hudson K . Geneticists' views on science policy formation and public outreach. Am J Med Genet A. 2005; 137(2):161-9. DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.30849. View

11.

Sufi S, Nenadic A, Silva R, Duckles B, Simera I, de Beyer J . Ten simple rules for measuring the impact of workshops. PLoS Comput Biol. 2018; 14(8):e1006191. PMC: 6116923. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006191. View