» Articles » PMID: 37463136

The Manifold Costs of Being a Non-native English Speaker in Science

Abstract

The use of English as the common language of science represents a major impediment to maximising the contribution of non-native English speakers to science. Yet few studies have quantified the consequences of language barriers on the career development of researchers who are non-native English speakers. By surveying 908 researchers in environmental sciences, this study estimates and compares the amount of effort required to conduct scientific activities in English between researchers from different countries and, thus, different linguistic and economic backgrounds. Our survey demonstrates that non-native English speakers, especially early in their careers, spend more effort than native English speakers in conducting scientific activities, from reading and writing papers and preparing presentations in English, to disseminating research in multiple languages. Language barriers can also cause them not to attend, or give oral presentations at, international conferences conducted in English. We urge scientific communities to recognise and tackle these disadvantages to release the untapped potential of non-native English speakers in science. This study also proposes potential solutions that can be implemented today by individuals, institutions, journals, funders, and conferences. Please see the Supporting information files (S2-S6 Text) for Alternative Language Abstracts and Figs 5 and 6.

Citing Articles

Exploring media representation of the exotic pet trade, with a focus on welfare: taxonomic, framing and language biases in peer-reviewed publications and newspaper articles.

Bielby J, Austen G, McMillan K, Wafflart S R Soc Open Sci. 2025; 12(3):240952.

PMID: 40046661 PMC: 11880843. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.240952.


Breaking language barriers: 'Not being fluent in English is often viewed as being an inferior scientist'.

Lenharo M Nature. 2025; .

PMID: 39930047 DOI: 10.1038/d41586-025-00157-5.


Supporting social justice through equity-based actions for a sustainable future in animal genetics (at the 39th International Society for Animal Genetics Conference).

Paez S, Mapholi N, Nesengani L, Lamont S, Aggrey S, Hanotte O Anim Genet. 2025; 56(1):e13506.

PMID: 39871675 PMC: 11773370. DOI: 10.1111/age.13506.


How should the advancement of large language models affect the practice of science?.

Binz M, Alaniz S, Roskies A, Aczel B, Bergstrom C, Allen C Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025; 122(5):e2401227121.

PMID: 39869798 PMC: 11804466. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2401227121.


Three versions of an atopic dermatitis case report written by humans, artificial intelligence, or both: Identification of authorship and preferences.

Giavina Bianchi M, Dadario A, Giavina Bianchi P, Machado B J Allergy Clin Immunol Glob. 2025; 4(1):100373.

PMID: 39759954 PMC: 11699452. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacig.2024.100373.


References
1.
Levitis E, Gould van Praag C, Gau R, Heunis S, DuPre E, Kiar G . Centering inclusivity in the design of online conferences-An OHBM-Open Science perspective. Gigascience. 2021; 10(8). PMC: 8377301. DOI: 10.1093/gigascience/giab051. View

2.
Ramirez-Castaneda V . Disadvantages in preparing and publishing scientific papers caused by the dominance of the English language in science: The case of Colombian researchers in biological sciences. PLoS One. 2020; 15(9):e0238372. PMC: 7494110. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238372. View

3.
Berdejo-Espinola V, Amano T . AI tools can improve equity in science. Science. 2023; 379(6636):991. DOI: 10.1126/science.adg9714. View

4.
Thorp H . ChatGPT is fun, but not an author. Science. 2023; 379(6630):313. DOI: 10.1126/science.adg7879. View

5.
Politzer-Ahles S, Girolamo T, Ghali S . Preliminary evidence of linguistic bias in academic reviewing. J Engl Acad Purp. 2020; 47. PMC: 7575202. DOI: 10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100895. View