» Articles » PMID: 37449161

Escaping but Not the Inactive X-linked Protein Complex Coding Genes May Achieve X-chromosome Dosage Compensation and Underlie X Chromosome Inactivation-related Diseases

Overview
Journal Heliyon
Specialty Social Sciences
Date 2023 Jul 14
PMID 37449161
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

X chromosome dosage compensation (XDC) refers to the process by which X-linked genes acquire expression equivalence between two sexes. Ohno proposed that XDC is achieved by two-fold upregulations of X-linked genes in both sexes and by silencing one X chromosome (X chromosome inactivation, XCI) in females. However, genes subject to two-fold upregulations as well as the underlying mechanism remain unclear. It's reported that gene dosage changes may only affect X-linked dosage-sensitive genes, such as protein complex coding genes (PCGs). Our results showed that in human PCGs are more likely to escape XCI and escaping PCGs (EsP) show two-fold higher expression than inactivated PCGs (InP) or other X-linked genes at RNA and protein levels in both sexes, which suggest that EsP may achieve upregulations and XDC. The higher expressions of EsP possibly result from the upregulations of the single active X chromosome (Xa), rather than escaping expressions from the inactive X chromosome (Xi). EsP genes have relatively high expression levels in humans and lower dN/dS ratios, suggesting that they are likely under stronger selection pressure over evolutionary time. Our study also suggests that SP1 transcription factor is significantly enriched in EsP and may be involved in the up-regulations of EsP on the active X. Finally, human EsP genes in this study are enriched in the toll-like receptor pathway, NF-kB pathway, apoptotic pathway, and abnormal mental, developmental and reproductive phenotypes. These findings suggest misregulations of EsP may be involved in autoimmune, reproductive, and neurological diseases, providing insight for the diagnosis and treatment of these diseases.

References
1.
Graves J . The origin and function of the mammalian Y chromosome and Y-borne genes--an evolving understanding. Bioessays. 1995; 17(4):311-20. DOI: 10.1002/bies.950170407. View

2.
Lemaitre C, Braga M, Gautier C, Sagot M, Tannier E, Marais G . Footprints of inversions at present and past pseudoautosomal boundaries in human sex chromosomes. Genome Biol Evol. 2010; 1:56-66. PMC: 2817401. DOI: 10.1093/gbe/evp006. View

3.
Payer B, Lee J . X chromosome dosage compensation: how mammals keep the balance. Annu Rev Genet. 2008; 42:733-72. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.genet.42.110807.091711. View

4.
Chen C, Shi W, Balaton B, Matthews A, Li Y, Arenillas D . YY1 binding association with sex-biased transcription revealed through X-linked transcript levels and allelic binding analyses. Sci Rep. 2016; 6:37324. PMC: 5114649. DOI: 10.1038/srep37324. View

5.
Drummond D, Bloom J, Adami C, Wilke C, Arnold F . Why highly expressed proteins evolve slowly. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005; 102(40):14338-43. PMC: 1242296. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0504070102. View