» Articles » PMID: 37439097

Conceptual Frameworks of Barriers and Facilitators to Perinatal Mental Healthcare: the MATRIx Models

Overview
Journal BJPsych Open
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2023 Jul 13
PMID 37439097
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Perinatal mental health (PMH) problems are a leading cause of maternal death and increase the risk of poor outcomes for women and their families. It is therefore important to identify the barriers and facilitators to implementing and accessing PMH care.

Aims: To develop a conceptual framework of barriers and facilitators to PMH care to inform PMH services.

Method: Relevant literature was systematically identified, categorised and mapped onto the framework. The framework was then validated through evaluating confidence with the evidence base and feedback from stakeholders (women and families, health professionals, commissioners and policy makers).

Results: Barriers and facilitators to PMH care were identified at seven levels: individual (e.g. beliefs about mental illness), health professional (e.g. confidence addressing perinatal mental illness), interpersonal (e.g. relationship between women and health professionals), organisational (e.g. continuity of carer), commissioner (e.g. referral pathways), political (e.g. women's economic status) and societal (e.g. stigma). The MATRIx conceptual frameworks provide pictorial representations of 66 barriers and 39 facilitators to PMH care.

Conclusions: The MATRIx frameworks highlight the complex interplay of individual and system-level factors across different stages of the care pathway that influence women accessing PMH care and effective implementation of PMH services. Recommendations are made for health policy and practice. These include using the conceptual frameworks to inform comprehensive, strategic and evidence-based approaches to PMH care; ensuring care is easy to access and flexible; providing culturally sensitive care; adequate funding of services and quality training for health professionals, with protected time to complete it.

References
1.
Webb R, Uddin N, Ford E, Easter A, Shakespeare J, Roberts N . Barriers and facilitators to implementing perinatal mental health care in health and social care settings: a systematic review. Lancet Psychiatry. 2021; 8(6):521-534. DOI: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30467-3. View

2.
Noyes J, Booth A, Lewin S, Carlsen B, Glenton C, Colvin C . Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings-paper 6: how to assess relevance of the data. Implement Sci. 2018; 13(Suppl 1):4. PMC: 5791042. DOI: 10.1186/s13012-017-0693-6. View

3.
Kruizinga R, Hartog I, Jacobs M, Daams J, Scherer-Rath M, Schilderman J . The effect of spiritual interventions addressing existential themes using a narrative approach on quality of life of cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychooncology. 2015; 25(3):253-65. DOI: 10.1002/pon.3910. View

4.
OKeeffe S, Martin P, Target M, Midgley N . 'I Just Stopped Going': A Mixed Methods Investigation Into Types of Therapy Dropout in Adolescents With Depression. Front Psychol. 2019; 10:75. PMC: 6370696. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00075. View

5.
Shea B, Reeves B, Wells G, Thuku M, Hamel C, Moran J . AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ. 2017; 358:j4008. PMC: 5833365. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.j4008. View