» Articles » PMID: 37430714

Influence of Multimodal Emotional Stimulations on Brain Activity: An Electroencephalographic Study

Overview
Journal Sensors (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2023 Jul 11
PMID 37430714
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study aimed to reveal the influence of emotional valence and sensory modality on neural activity in response to multimodal emotional stimuli using scalp EEG. In this study, 20 healthy participants completed the emotional multimodal stimulation experiment for three stimulus modalities (audio, visual, and audio-visual), all of which are from the same video source with two emotional components (pleasure or unpleasure), and EEG data were collected using six experimental conditions and one resting state. We analyzed power spectral density (PSD) and event-related potential (ERP) components in response to multimodal emotional stimuli, for spectral and temporal analysis. PSD results showed that the single modality (audio only/visual only) emotional stimulation PSD differed from multi-modality (audio-visual) in a wide brain and band range due to the changes in modality and not from the changes in emotional degree. The most pronounced N200-to-P300 potential shifts occurred in monomodal rather than multimodal emotional stimulations. This study suggests that emotional saliency and sensory processing efficiency perform a significant role in shaping neural activity during multimodal emotional stimulation, with the sensory modality being more influential in PSD. These findings contribute to our understanding of the neural mechanisms involved in multimodal emotional stimulation.

Citing Articles

Cross-Sensory EEG Emotion Recognition with Filter Bank Riemannian Feature and Adversarial Domain Adaptation.

Gao C, Uchitomi H, Miyake Y Brain Sci. 2023; 13(9).

PMID: 37759927 PMC: 10526196. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13091326.

References
1.
Yu W, Wu X, Chen Y, Liang Z, Jiang J, Misrani A . Pelvic Pain Alters Functional Connectivity Between Anterior Cingulate Cortex and Hippocampus in Both Humans and a Rat Model. Front Syst Neurosci. 2021; 15:642349. PMC: 8210850. DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2021.642349. View

2.
Gramfort A, Luessi M, Larson E, Engemann D, Strohmeier D, Brodbeck C . MNE software for processing MEG and EEG data. Neuroimage. 2013; 86:446-60. PMC: 3930851. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.10.027. View

3.
Shu L, Xie J, Yang M, Li Z, Li Z, Liao D . A Review of Emotion Recognition Using Physiological Signals. Sensors (Basel). 2018; 18(7). PMC: 6069143. DOI: 10.3390/s18072074. View

4.
Kemp A, Hopkinson P, Hermens D, Rowe D, Sumich A, Clark C . Fronto-temporal alterations within the first 200 ms during an attentional task distinguish major depression, non-clinical participants with depressed mood and healthy controls: a potential biomarker?. Hum Brain Mapp. 2008; 30(2):602-14. PMC: 6870851. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.20528. View

5.
Cantero J, Atienza M, Salas R, Dominguez-Marin E . Effects of prolonged waking-auditory stimulation on electroencephalogram synchronization and cortical coherence during subsequent slow-wave sleep. J Neurosci. 2002; 22(11):4702-8. PMC: 6758780. DOI: 20026463. View