» Articles » PMID: 37430569

Development and Earliest Validation of a Portable Device for Quantification of Hallux Extension Strength (QuHalEx)

Overview
Journal Sensors (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2023 Jul 11
PMID 37430569
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Hallux strength is associated with sports performance and balance across the lifespan, and independently predicts falls in older adults. In rehabilitation, Medical Research Council (MRC) Manual Muscle Testing (MMT) is the clinical standard for hallux strength assessment, but subtle weakness and longitudinal changes in strength may go undetected. To address the need for research-grade yet clinically feasible options, we designed a new load cell device and testing protocol to Quantify Hallux Extension strength (QuHalEx). We aim to describe the device, protocol and initial validation. In benchtop testing, we used eight precision weights to apply known loads from 9.81 to 78.5 N. In healthy adults, we performed three maximal isometric tests for hallux extension and flexion on the right and left sides. We calculated the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) with 95% confidence interval and descriptively compared our isometric force-time output to published parameters. QuHalEx benchtop absolute error ranged from 0.02 to 0.41 (mean 0.14) N. Benchtop and human intrasession output was repeatable (ICC 0.90-1.00, < 0.001). Hallux strength in our sample ( = 38, age 33.5 ± 9.6 years, 53% female, 55% white) ranged from 23.1 to 82.0 N peak extension force and 32.0 to 142.4 N peak flexion, and differences of ~10 N (15%) between toes of the same MRC grade (5) suggest that QuHalEx is able to detect subtle weakness and interlimb asymmetries that are missed by MMT. Our results support ongoing QuHalEx validation and device refinement with a longer-term goal of widespread clinical and research application.

Citing Articles

Characterization of Great Toe Extension Strength Using ToeScale-A Novel Portable Device.

Chandrashekhar R, Fonseca Perez L, Wang H Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(15).

PMID: 39123887 PMC: 11314734. DOI: 10.3390/s24154841.


Reliability and clinical applicability of lower limp strength using an enhanced paper grip strength.

Tsekoura M, Pantou M, Fousekis K, Billis E, Gliatis J, Tsepis E Eur J Transl Myol. 2023; 33(4).

PMID: 38050432 PMC: 10811633. DOI: 10.4081/ejtm.2023.11841.

References
1.
Henderson A, Wayne Johnson A, Rasmussen L, Peine W, Symons S, Scoresby K . Early-Stage Diabetic Neuropathy Reduces Foot Strength and Intrinsic but Not Extrinsic Foot Muscle Size. J Diabetes Res. 2020; 2020:9536362. PMC: 7091556. DOI: 10.1155/2020/9536362. View

2.
Gonzalez-Rosalen J, Benitez-Martinez J, Medina-Mirapeix F, Cuerda-Del Pino A, Cervello A, Agustin R . Intra- and Inter-Rater Reliability of Strength Measurements Using a Pull Hand-Held Dynamometer Fixed to the Examiner's Body and Comparison with Push Dynamometry. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021; 11(7). PMC: 8303393. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11071230. View

3.
Yamauchi J, Koyama K . Importance of toe flexor strength in vertical jump performance. J Biomech. 2020; 104:109719. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.109719. View

4.
Xiao S, Zhang X, Deng L, Zhang S, Cui K, Fu W . Relationships between Foot Morphology and Foot Muscle Strength in Healthy Adults. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(4). PMC: 7068515. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17041274. View

5.
Mentiplay B, Perraton L, Bower K, Adair B, Pua Y, Williams G . Assessment of Lower Limb Muscle Strength and Power Using Hand-Held and Fixed Dynamometry: A Reliability and Validity Study. PLoS One. 2015; 10(10):e0140822. PMC: 4624940. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140822. View