» Articles » PMID: 37430197

Patient Activation in Adults Attending Appointments in General Practice: a Cross-sectional Study

Overview
Journal BMC Prim Care
Date 2023 Jul 10
PMID 37430197
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Patient activation refers to patients' knowledge, confidence, skills, ability, beliefs, and willingness to manage their health and healthcare. Patient activation is an essential component of self-management and identifying patient activation levels will identify people at risk for health decline at an earlier stage. We aimed to explore patient activation in among adults attending general practice by (1) investigating differences in patient activation according to characteristics and markers of health-related behaviour; (2) examining the associations of quality of life and satisfaction with health with patient activation; and (3) comparing patient activation between persons with or without type 2 diabetes (T2D) and with or without elevated T2D risk.

Methods: We performed a cross-sectional study and recruited 1,173 adult patients from four Norwegian general practices between May to December 2019. The participants completed a questionnaire containing sociodemographic and clinical variables, the Patient Activation Measure (PAM-13), the quality of life and satisfaction with health items from the WHO Quality of Life-BREF, three questions about exercise (regularity, intensity and exercise time), the Finnish Diabetes Risk Score (FINDRISC) and Body Mass Index. We tested differences between groups and associations using Chi-squared tests, Fisher's exact tests, t-tests, one-way ANOVAs and Spearman's rho tests.

Results: The sample's mean PAM-13 score was 69.8 (0-100) (SD 14.8). In the total population, we found that participants reporting higher patient activation scores also reported more favourable health-related behaviours (exercise and healthy eating). We found positive correlations between the PAM-13 scores and, respectively, the quality of life score and the satisfaction with health score. We found no differences in patient activation between people with or without T2D and those with or without elevated T2D risk.

Conclusions: We found that higher patient activation was associated with favourable health-related behaviours, a better quality of life and better satisfaction with health among adults attending four general practices in Norway. Assessing patient activation has the potential to help general practitioners identify patients who might benefit from closer follow-up in advance of negative health outcomes.

Citing Articles

Becoming the actively engaged patient: patient-driven strategies for activation in CKD care.

Iroegbu C, Matura L, Tuot D J Nephrol. 2025; .

PMID: 40019702 DOI: 10.1007/s40620-025-02241-5.


Experiences With a Novel Micro-Choice-Based Concentrated Group Intervention for People With Type 2 Diabetes: A Qualitative Study.

Bendixen B, Wilhelmsen-Langeland A, Lomborg K, Makestad E, Skogheim T, Schonberg A Sci Diabetes Self Manag Care. 2025; 51(1):36-46.

PMID: 39901587 PMC: 11816451. DOI: 10.1177/26350106241304422.


A regional program evaluation of the Stanford Chronic Pain Self-Management Program in Eastern Ontario, Canada.

Hum E, Karunananthan S, Adil A, Moroz I, Davidson R, Liddy C Can J Pain. 2025; 9(1):2440338.

PMID: 39886609 PMC: 11776463. DOI: 10.1080/24740527.2024.2440338.


Evaluation of an interprofessional follow-up intervention among people with type 2 diabetes in primary care-A randomized controlled trial with embedded qualitative interviews.

Graue M, Igland J, Haugstvedt A, Hernar I, Birkeland K, Zoffmann V PLoS One. 2023; 18(11):e0291255.

PMID: 37967084 PMC: 10650997. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291255.

References
1.
Hibbard J, Greene J . What the evidence shows about patient activation: better health outcomes and care experiences; fewer data on costs. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013; 32(2):207-14. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1061. View

2.
Powers M, Bardsley J, Cypress M, Duker P, Funnell M, Fischl A . Diabetes Self-management Education and Support in Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Educ. 2017; 43(1):40-53. DOI: 10.1177/0145721716689694. View

3.
Bolen S, Chandar A, Falck-Ytter C, Tyler C, Perzynski A, Gertz A . Effectiveness and safety of patient activation interventions for adults with type 2 diabetes: systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression. J Gen Intern Med. 2014; 29(8):1166-76. PMC: 4099447. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-014-2855-4. View

4.
Hibbard J, Greene J, Sacks R, Overton V, Parrotta C . Improving Population Health Management Strategies: Identifying Patients Who Are More Likely to Be Users of Avoidable Costly Care and Those More Likely to Develop a New Chronic Disease. Health Serv Res. 2016; 52(4):1297-1309. PMC: 5517668. DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12545. View

5.
Hibbard J, Mahoney E, Stockard J, Tusler M . Development and testing of a short form of the patient activation measure. Health Serv Res. 2005; 40(6 Pt 1):1918-30. PMC: 1361231. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00438.x. View