» Articles » PMID: 33148185

Relationship Between Patient Activation Measurement and Self-rated Health in Patients with Chronic Diseases

Overview
Journal BMC Fam Pract
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2020 Nov 5
PMID 33148185
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: In the aging population, chronic diseases and multimorbidity are common. Therefore, it is important to engage patients in their self-care. The aim of this study was to analyze the relationship between activity in self-care and self-rated health among primary care patients with chronic diseases.

Methods: The data of the present study were derived from a research project on the Participatory Patient Care Planning in Primary Care (4PHC). A total of 605 patients were recruited in the Siilinjärvi Health Center from those patients who were being monitored due to the treatment of hypertension, ischemic heart disease or diabetes. We evaluated the level of patient's activity in self-care with the Patient Activation Measurement (PAM). Self-rated health (SRH) was measured with the 5-item Likert scale. An adjusted hypothesis of linearity across categories of PAM and self-rated health was estimated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA).

Results: It was found that 76 patients had low activity, 185 had moderate while 336 patients had high activity as measured with PAM. Patients with the highest activity were younger, less depressed, had a lower body mass index and a higher level of physical activity than those with the lower activity. Correspondingly, good SRH was perceived by 29, 45 and 67% of the patients in these three PAM groups adjusted with sex, age, depressive symptoms (BDI) and number of diseases. There was a significant linear trend (adjusted with age, number of diseases and depressive symptoms) between SRH and PAM, p < 0.001.

Conclusions: Activity in self-care had an independent, linear relationship with the self-rated health. The present findings suggest that Patient Activation Measurement has the potential to categorize the patients according to their perceived health and their needs related to their disease management and self-care. The present results warrant longitudinal studies on the impact of promoting patient activation levels.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02992431 . Registered 14 December 2016 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02992431.

Citing Articles

The relationship between self-care preparedness and quality of life in a 3-year-follow-up: a study in primary health care.

Mikkonen U, Tusa N, Sinikallio S, Lehto S, Ruusunen A, Kautiainen H Fam Pract. 2024; 42(1).

PMID: 39673498 PMC: 11770812. DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmae069.


The relationship between medication beliefs, patient activation, and self-rated health in patients taking oral anticancer agents.

Hwang M, Cho Y, Gong Y, Jiang Y Support Care Cancer. 2024; 32(7):449.

PMID: 38904864 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-024-08672-3.


Measuring patient activation: the utility of the Patient Activation Measure administered in an interview setting.

Holter M, Avian A, Weger M, Strini S, Michelitsch M, Brenk-Franz K Qual Life Res. 2024; 33(5):1389-1400.

PMID: 38388807 PMC: 11045573. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-024-03614-2.


Patient activation levels and socioeconomic factors among the Amazonas population with diabetes: a cross-sectional study.

De Leon E, Campos H, Santos N, Brito F, Almeida F BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24(1):169.

PMID: 38321433 PMC: 10848446. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-10529-0.


A short tool to screen self-care preparedness: cross-sectional study in general practice.

Mikkonen U, Tusa N, Sinikallio S, Kautiainen H, Mantyselka P Fam Pract. 2023; 41(6):970-976.

PMID: 37975623 PMC: 11636555. DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmad107.


References
1.
Harvey L, Fowles J, Xi M, Terry P . When activation changes, what else changes? the relationship between change in patient activation measure (PAM) and employees' health status and health behaviors. Patient Educ Couns. 2012; 88(2):338-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.02.005. View

2.
Mikkola I, Hagnas M, Hartsenko J, Kaila M, Winell K . A Personalized Care Plan Is Positively Associated With Better Clinical Outcomes in the Care of Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Real-Life Study. Can J Diabetes. 2019; 44(2):133-138. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2019.05.003. View

3.
Zill J, Dwinger S, Kriston L, Rohenkohl A, Harter M, Dirmaier J . Psychometric evaluation of the German version of the Patient Activation Measure (PAM13). BMC Public Health. 2013; 13:1027. PMC: 4228438. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1027. View

4.
Lorig K, Holman H . Self-management education: history, definition, outcomes, and mechanisms. Ann Behav Med. 2003; 26(1):1-7. DOI: 10.1207/S15324796ABM2601_01. View

5.
Blakemore A, Hann M, Howells K, Panagioti M, Sidaway M, Reeves D . Patient activation in older people with long-term conditions and multimorbidity: correlates and change in a cohort study in the United Kingdom. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016; 16(1):582. PMC: 5069882. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-016-1843-2. View