» Articles » PMID: 37428480

Abatacept, Cenicriviroc, or Infliximab for Treatment of Adults Hospitalized With COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Abstract

Importance: Immune dysregulation contributes to poorer outcomes in COVID-19.

Objective: To investigate whether abatacept, cenicriviroc, or infliximab provides benefit when added to standard care for COVID-19 pneumonia.

Design, Setting, And Participants: Randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled clinical trial using a master protocol to investigate immunomodulators added to standard care for treatment of participants hospitalized with COVID-19 pneumonia. The results of 3 substudies are reported from 95 hospitals at 85 clinical research sites in the US and Latin America. Hospitalized patients 18 years or older with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection within 14 days and evidence of pulmonary involvement underwent randomization between October 2020 and December 2021.

Interventions: Single infusion of abatacept (10 mg/kg; maximum dose, 1000 mg) or infliximab (5 mg/kg) or a 28-day oral course of cenicriviroc (300-mg loading dose followed by 150 mg twice per day).

Main Outcomes And Measures: The primary outcome was time to recovery by day 28 evaluated using an 8-point ordinal scale (higher scores indicate better health). Recovery was defined as the first day the participant scored at least 6 on the ordinal scale.

Results: Of the 1971 participants randomized across the 3 substudies, the mean (SD) age was 54.8 (14.6) years and 1218 (61.8%) were men. The primary end point of time to recovery from COVID-19 pneumonia was not significantly different for abatacept (recovery rate ratio [RRR], 1.12 [95% CI, 0.98-1.28]; P = .09), cenicriviroc (RRR, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.86-1.18]; P = .94), or infliximab (RRR, 1.12 [95% CI, 0.99-1.28]; P = .08) compared with placebo. All-cause 28-day mortality was 11.0% for abatacept vs 15.1% for placebo (odds ratio [OR], 0.62 [95% CI, 0.41-0.94]), 13.8% for cenicriviroc vs 11.9% for placebo (OR, 1.18 [95% CI 0.72-1.94]), and 10.1% for infliximab vs 14.5% for placebo (OR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.39-0.90]). Safety outcomes were comparable between active treatment and placebo, including secondary infections, in all 3 substudies.

Conclusions And Relevance: Time to recovery from COVID-19 pneumonia among hospitalized participants was not significantly different for abatacept, cenicriviroc, or infliximab vs placebo.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04593940.

Citing Articles

Resource Use in the Randomized Master Protocol for Immune Modulators for Treating COVID-19 (ACTIV-1 IM): A Secondary Data Analysis.

Lachiewicz A, Shah M, Der T, Cyr D, Al-Khalidi H, Lindsell C CHEST Crit Care. 2024; 2(4).

PMID: 39610848 PMC: 11600409. DOI: 10.1016/j.chstcc.2024.100095.


The statistical design and analysis of pandemic platform trials: Implications for the future.

Lindsell C, Shotwell M, Anstrom K, Berry S, Brittain E, Harrell F J Clin Transl Sci. 2024; 8(1):e155.

PMID: 39540110 PMC: 11557281. DOI: 10.1017/cts.2024.514.


The Impact of Infliximab on Hyperinflammation State in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients: A Retrospective Study.

Saied Y, Abou Warda A, Allam R, Syed W, Al-Rawi M, Iqbal A Medicina (Kaunas). 2024; 60(10).

PMID: 39459457 PMC: 11509666. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60101670.


Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib on COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Wilar G, Suhandi C, Fukunaga K, Kawahata I Heliyon. 2024; 10(19):e38229.

PMID: 39381111 PMC: 11456853. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38229.


The winding road: Infectious disease considerations for CAR-T and other novel adoptive cellular therapies in the era of COVID-19.

Singh K, Rocco J, Nussenblatt V Semin Hematol. 2024; 61(5):321-332.

PMID: 39379249 PMC: 11626729. DOI: 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2024.08.002.