» Articles » PMID: 37425204

Ophthalmic Applicator Displacement As a Method of Treating Large Diffuse Uveal Melanomas

Abstract

Purpose: The presentation of results of an ophthalmic plaque displacement as a brachytherapy treatment method of large diffuse uveal melanomas.

Material And Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of treatment results of 9 patients with large diffuse uveal melanomas using ophthalmic plaque displacement. Patients were treated with this method in our center between 2012 and 2021 (last follow-up visit in 2023). To achieve appropriate radiation dose distribution for large tumors with a base greater than 18 mm, brachytherapy (Ru in 7 patients and I in 2 patients) with applicator displacement was used as primary treatment. Median follow-up was 2.9 years, and for patients with positive primary treatment results, it was 1.7 months. Median time to local relapse was 2.3 years.

Results: In 5 patients, a positive result of local treatment was obtained, out of whom, one patient underwent enucleation due to complications. In the next 4 cases, local recurrence developed. In all tumors, the use of applicator displacement method caused that planning target volume (PTV) was effectively covered with treatment isodose.

Conclusions: Brachytherapy with ocular applicator displacement allows for the treatment of tumors with base measurements larger than 18 mm. The application of this method may be considered as an alternative for eye enucleation in particular cases of large diffuse tumors, such as a neoplasm of the eye with vison, or when a patient does not consent to enucleation.

Citing Articles

A study comparing baseline and best-corrected visual acuity after iodine-125 episcleral brachytherapy in uveal melanoma.

Miguel D, de Frutos J, Alonso P, Garcia-Alvarez C, Saornil M, Diezhandino P J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2023; 15(5):350-356.

PMID: 38026075 PMC: 10669921. DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2023.132658.

References
1.
Kowal J, Markiewicz A, Debicka-Kumela M, Bogdali A, Jakubowska B, Karska-Basta I . Analysis of local recurrence causes in uveal melanoma patients treated with I brachytherapy - a single institution study. J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2020; 11(6):554-562. PMC: 6964341. DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2019.90985. View

2.
Sas-Korczynska B, Markiewicz A, Romanowska-Dixon B, Pluta E . Preliminary results of proton radiotherapy for choroidal melanoma - the Kraków experience. Contemp Oncol (Pozn). 2014; 18(5):359-66. PMC: 4248051. DOI: 10.5114/wo.2014.42233. View

3.
Shields J, Shields C . Management of posterior uveal melanoma: past, present, and future: the 2014 Charles L. Schepens lecture. Ophthalmology. 2014; 122(2):414-28. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.08.046. View

4.
Mirshahi R, Sedaghat A, Jaberi R, Azma Z, Mazloumi M, Naseripour M . Ruthenium-106 plaque radiotherapy for uveal melanoma: analysis of tumor dimension and location on anatomical and functional results. BMC Ophthalmol. 2022; 22(1):309. PMC: 9288719. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-022-02521-9. View

5.
. The American Brachytherapy Society consensus guidelines for plaque brachytherapy of uveal melanoma and retinoblastoma. Brachytherapy. 2013; 13(1):1-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2013.11.008. View