» Articles » PMID: 37422162

Patient, Provider, and Practice Characteristics Predicting Use of Diagnostic Imaging in Primary Care: Cross-Sectional Data From the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Radiology
Date 2023 Jul 8
PMID 37422162
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To determine imaging utilization rates in outpatient primary care visits and factors influencing likelihood of imaging use.

Methods: We used 2013 to 2018 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey cross-sectional data. All visits to primary care clinics during the study period were included in the sample. Descriptive statistics on visit characteristics including imaging utilization were calculated. Logistic regression analyses evaluated the influence of a variety of patient-, provider-, and practice-level variables on the odds of obtaining diagnostic imaging, further subdivided by modality (radiographs, CT, MRI, and ultrasound). The data's survey weighting was accounted for to produce valid national-level estimates of imaging use for US office-based primary care visits.

Results: Using survey weights, approximately 2.8 billion patient visits were included. Diagnostic imaging was ordered at 12.5% of visits with radiographs the most common (4.3%) and MRI the least common (0.8%). Imaging utilization was similar or greater among minority patients compared with White, non-Hispanic patients. Physician assistants used imaging at higher rates than physicians, in particular CT at 6.5% of visits compared with 0.7% for doctors of medicine and doctors of osteopathic medicine (odds ratio 5.67, 95% confidence interval 4.07-7.88).

Conclusion: Disparities in rates of imaging utilization for minorities seen in other health care settings were not present in this sample of primary care visits, supporting that access to primary care is a path to promote health equity. Higher rates of imaging utilization among advanced-level practitioners highlight an opportunity to evaluate imaging appropriateness and promote equitable, high-value imaging among all practitioners.

Citing Articles

Abdominal Ultrasonography Used for Abdominal Pain in the Rural Outpatient Setting of South Texas: Impact on Patient Outcomes.

Mills-Reyes E, Devlin K, Olmedo P Cureus. 2024; 16(7):e64462.

PMID: 39135831 PMC: 11318497. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.64462.

References
1.
Leape L, Park R, Solomon D, Chassin M, Kosecoff J, Brook R . Does inappropriate use explain small-area variations in the use of health care services?. JAMA. 1990; 263(5):669-72. View

2.
Hughes D, Jiang M, Duszak Jr R . A comparison of diagnostic imaging ordering patterns between advanced practice clinicians and primary care physicians following office-based evaluation and management visits. JAMA Intern Med. 2014; 175(1):101-7. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.6349. View

3.
Pakpoor J, Raad M, Harris A, Puvanesarajah V, Canner J, Nadgir R . Diagnostic Imaging Use for the Initial Evaluation of Low Back Pain by Primary Care Providers in the United States: 2011-2016. J Am Coll Radiol. 2019; 16(11):1522-1527. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2019.04.015. View

4.
Hong A, Levin D, Parker L, Rao V, Ross-Degnan D, Wharam J . Trends in Diagnostic Imaging Utilization among Medicare and Commercially Insured Adults from 2003 through 2016. Radiology. 2020; 294(2):342-350. PMC: 6996668. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2019191116. View

5.
von Elm E, Altman D, Egger M, Pocock S, Gotzsche P, Vandenbroucke J . The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med. 2007; 147(8):573-7. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00010. View