» Articles » PMID: 31092354

Racial and Ethnic Differences in Diagnostic Imaging Utilization During Adult Emergency Department Visits in the United States, 2005 to 2014

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Radiology
Date 2019 May 17
PMID 31092354
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To compare the use of medical imaging (x-ray [XR], CT, ultrasound, and MRI) in the emergency department (ED) for adult patients of different racial and ethnic groups in the United States from 2005 to 2014.

Methods: We performed a multilevel stratified regression analysis of the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey ED Subfile, a nationally representative database of hospital-based ED visits. We examined race (white, black, Asian, other) and ethnicity (Hispanic versus non-Hispanic) as the primary exposures for the outcomes of ED medical imaging use (XR, CT, ultrasound, MRI, and any imaging). We controlled for other potential patient-level and facility-level determinants of ED imaging use.

Results: Approximately half (48.8%) of the 225,037 adult patient ED visits underwent imaging; 36.1% underwent XR, 16.4% CT, 4.1% ultrasound, and 0.8% MRI. White patients received imaging during 51.3% of their encounters, black patients received imaging during 43.6% of their encounters, Asians received imaging during 50.8% of their encounters, and other races received imaging during 46% of their encounters. As compared with white patients, black patients had decreased adjusted odds of receiving imaging in the ED (odds ratio [OR] = 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.84-0.89). Comparatively, black patients had a lower odds of CT scan (OR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.77-0.83) or MRI (OR = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.65-0.85). Hispanic patients and Asian patients had a higher odds of receiving ultrasound (OR = 1.36, 95% CI: 1.27-1.44 and OR = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.10-1.42), respectively.

Implications: We observed significant racial and ethnic differences in medical imaging use in the ED even after controlling for patient- and facility-level factors.

Citing Articles

Acquisition parameters influence AI recognition of race in chest x-rays and mitigating these factors reduces underdiagnosis bias.

Lotter W Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):7465.

PMID: 39198519 PMC: 11358468. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-52003-3.


Race and Ethnicity and Diagnostic Testing for Common Conditions in the Acute Care Setting.

Ellenbogen M, Weygandt P, Newman-Toker D, Anderson A, Rim N, Brotman D JAMA Netw Open. 2024; 7(8):e2430306.

PMID: 39190305 PMC: 11350469. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.30306.


Ethnicity and outcomes for patients with gastrointestinal disorders attending an emergency department serving a multi-ethnic population.

Martin C, Coats T, Pareek M, Khunti K, Abeyratne R, Brunskill N BMC Med. 2024; 22(1):275.

PMID: 38956541 PMC: 11218405. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-024-03490-0.


Bridging the gap: improving correspondence between low-field and high-field magnetic resonance images in young people.

Cooper R, Hayes R, Corcoran M, Sheth K, Arnold T, Stein J Front Neurol. 2024; 15():1339223.

PMID: 38585353 PMC: 10995930. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1339223.


Race and Ethnicity and Primary Language in Emergency Department Triage.

Joseph J, Kennedy M, Landry A, Marsh R, Baymon D, Im D JAMA Netw Open. 2023; 6(10):e2337557.

PMID: 37824142 PMC: 10570890. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.37557.