» Articles » PMID: 37419999

A Tailored Phase I-specific Patient-reported Outcome (PRO) Survey to Capture the Patient Experience of Symptomatic Adverse Events

Abstract

Background: Patient perspectives are fundamental to defining tolerability of investigational anti-neoplastic therapies in clinical trials. Phase I trials present a unique challenge in designing tools for efficiently collecting patient-reported outcomes (PROs) given the difficulty of anticipating adverse events of relevance. However, phase I trials also offer an opportunity for investigators to optimize drug dosing based on tolerability for future larger-scale trials and in eventual clinical practice. Existing tools for comprehensively capturing PROs are generally cumbersome and are not routinely used in phase I trials.

Methods: Here, we describe the creation of a tailored survey based on the National Cancer Institute's PRO-CTCAE for collecting patients' perspectives on symptomatic adverse events in phase I trials in oncology.

Results: We describe our stepwise approach to condensing the original 78-symptom library into a modified 30 term core list of symptoms which can be efficiently applied. We further show that our tailored survey aligns with phase I trialists' perspectives on symptoms of relevance.

Conclusions: This tailored survey represents the first PRO tool developed specifically for assessing tolerability in the phase I oncology population. We provide recommendations for future work aimed at integrating this survey into clinical practice.

Citing Articles

Leveraging Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Optimal Dose Selection in Early Phase Cancer Trials.

Byrom B, Everhart A, Cordero P, Garratt C, Meyer T JMIR Cancer. 2025; 11:e64611.

PMID: 40020239 PMC: 11888580. DOI: 10.2196/64611.


Advancing patient-centric care: integrating patient reported outcomes for tolerability assessment in early phase clinical trials - insights from an expert virtual roundtable.

Yap C, Aiyegbusi O, Alger E, Basch E, Bell J, Bhatnagar V EClinicalMedicine. 2024; 76:102838.

PMID: 39386161 PMC: 11462221. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102838.


Patient and public involvement and engagement in the development of innovative patient-centric early phase dose-finding trial designs.

Alger E, Van Zyl M, Aiyegbusi O, Chuter D, Dean L, Minchom A Res Involv Engagem. 2024; 10(1):63.

PMID: 38898479 PMC: 11186095. DOI: 10.1186/s40900-024-00599-7.

References
1.
Calvert M, Kyte D, Mercieca-Bebber R, Slade A, King M, Hunn A . Guidelines for Inclusion of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Clinical Trial Protocols: The SPIRIT-PRO Extension. JAMA. 2018; 319(5):483-494. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.21903. View

2.
Basch E, Pugh S, Dueck A, Mitchell S, Berk L, Fogh S . Feasibility of Patient Reporting of Symptomatic Adverse Events via the Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) in a Chemoradiotherapy Cooperative Group Multicenter Clinical Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017; 98(2):409-418. PMC: 5557037. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.02.002. View

3.
Shepshelovich D, McDonald K, Spreafico A, Razak A, Bedard P, Siu L . Feasibility Assessment of Using the Complete Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) Item Library. Oncologist. 2019; 24(4):e146-e148. PMC: 6459233. DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0332. View

4.
Verstovsek S, Mesa R, Gotlib J, Levy R, Gupta V, Dipersio J . A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ruxolitinib for myelofibrosis. N Engl J Med. 2012; 366(9):799-807. PMC: 4822164. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1110557. View

5.
Dueck A, Mendoza T, Mitchell S, Reeve B, Castro K, Rogak L . Validity and Reliability of the US National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE). JAMA Oncol. 2015; 1(8):1051-9. PMC: 4857599. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.2639. View