» Articles » PMID: 27310432

Patient-reported Outcome Measurement in Drug Discovery: a Tool to Improve Accuracy and Completeness of Efficacy and Safety Data

Overview
Specialties Chemistry
Pharmacology
Date 2016 Jun 17
PMID 27310432
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) reflect how patients feel and function as conveyed directly by patients themselves, for example symptoms and physical functioning. PRO measures can be included in any phase of product development as primary, secondary, or exploratory endpoints to understand the impact of treatment on the patient experience.

Areas Covered: In this review, the authors describe approaches commonly used to assess PROs in drug development programs, including how to select or develop outcomes and measures, implement these in trials, and analyze data. Barriers and facilitators for effectively including PROs in clinical trials are discussed, and strategies for making labeling claims based on PRO data are noted.

Expert Opinion: Early planning with PRO experts is recommended to assure a successful PRO strategy in a product development program. Outcomes that are meaningful to patients should be rationally identified early in a product development program based on qualitative work, literature search and/or assumed mechanism of action. Measures corresponding to those outcomes should be selected or developed, with demonstration of robust psychometric properties in a related patient population. Ideally, these measures will be tested prior to a pivotal trial to support the design and analysis in the pivotal trial. Selection of timing and mode of assessments should be specified a priori and justified. If a labeling claim is sought, a statistical plan should be pre-specified. Strategies to minimize and handle missing data in analyses should be planned up front.

Citing Articles

Application of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurements in Adult Tumor Clinical Trials in China: Cross-Sectional Study.

Jia Y, Li Q, Zhang X, Yan Y, Yan S, Li S J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e45719.

PMID: 38718388 PMC: 11112474. DOI: 10.2196/45719.


A tailored phase I-specific patient-reported outcome (PRO) survey to capture the patient experience of symptomatic adverse events.

Janse van Rensburg H, Liu Z, Watson G, Veitch Z, Shepshelovich D, Spreafico A Br J Cancer. 2023; 129(4):612-619.

PMID: 37419999 PMC: 10421959. DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02307-w.


Patient-Reported Outcomes During and After Treatment for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer in the PROSPECT Trial (Alliance N1048).

Basch E, Dueck A, Mitchell S, Mamon H, Weiser M, Saltz L J Clin Oncol. 2023; 41(21):3724-3734.

PMID: 37270691 PMC: 10351948. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.23.00903.


The Effect of Collaborative Reviews of Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes on the Congruence of Patient- and Clinician-Reported Toxicity in Cancer Patients Receiving Systemic Therapy: Prospective, Multicenter, Observational Clinical Trial.

Trojan A, Leuthold N, Thomssen C, Rody A, Winder T, Jakob A J Med Internet Res. 2021; 23(8):e29271.

PMID: 34383675 PMC: 8380582. DOI: 10.2196/29271.


Patient-reported outcomes and patient-reported outcome measures in interstitial lung disease: where to go from here?.

Kalluri M, Luppi F, Vancheri A, Vancheri C, Balestro E, Varone F Eur Respir Rev. 2021; 30(160).

PMID: 34039675 PMC: 9488962. DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0026-2021.