» Articles » PMID: 37413982

Multi-scale Multi-physics Model of Brain Interstitial Water Flux by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Overview
Journal J Neural Eng
Date 2023 Jul 6
PMID 37413982
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) generates sustained electric fields in the brain, that may be amplified when crossing capillary walls (across blood-brain barrier, BBB). Electric fields across the BBB may generate fluid flow by electroosmosis. We consider that tDCS may thus enhance interstitial fluid flow.. We developed a modeling pipeline novel in both (1) spanning the mm (head),m (capillary network), and then nm (down to BBB tight junction (TJ)) scales; and (2) coupling electric current flow to fluid current flow across these scales. Electroosmotic coupling was parametrized based on prior measures of fluid flow across isolated BBB layers. Electric field amplification across the BBB in a realistic capillary network was converted to volumetric fluid exchange.. The ultrastructure of the BBB results in peak electric fields (per mA of applied current) of 32-63Vm-1across capillary wall and >1150Vm-1in TJs (contrasted with 0.3Vm-1in parenchyma). Based on an electroosmotic coupling of 1.0 × 10- 5.6 × 10m3s-1m2perVm-1, peak water fluxes across the BBB are 2.44 × 10- 6.94 × 10m3s-1m2, with a peak 1.5 × 10- 5.6 × 10m3min-1m3interstitial water exchange (per mA).. Using this pipeline, the fluid exchange rate per each brain voxel can be predicted for any tDCS dose (electrode montage, current) or anatomy. Under experimentally constrained tissue properties, we predicted tDCS produces a fluid exchange rate comparable to endogenous flow, so doubling fluid exchange with further local flow rate hot spots ('jets'). The validation and implication of such tDCS brain 'flushing' is important to establish.

Citing Articles

Enabling electric field model of microscopically realistic brain.

Qi Z, Noetscher G, Miles A, Weise K, Knosche T, Cadman C Brain Stimul. 2024; 18(1):77-93.

PMID: 39710004 PMC: 11867869. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2024.12.1192.


Quasistatic approximation in neuromodulation.

Wang B, Peterchev A, Gaugain G, Ilmoniemi R, Grill W, Bikson M J Neural Eng. 2024; 21(4).

PMID: 38994790 PMC: 11370654. DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ad625e.


The Fifth Bioelectronic Medicine Summit: today's tools, tomorrow's therapies.

Chang E, Gabalski A, Huerta T, Datta-Chaudhuri T, Zanos T, Zanos S Bioelectron Med. 2023; 9(1):21.

PMID: 37794457 PMC: 10552422. DOI: 10.1186/s42234-023-00123-4.

References
1.
Jiang J, Truong D, Esmaeilpour Z, Huang Y, Badran B, Bikson M . Enhanced tES and tDCS computational models by meninges emulation. J Neural Eng. 2019; 17(1):016027. PMC: 7254922. DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ab549d. View

2.
Schlageter K, Molnar P, Lapin G, Groothuis D . Microvessel organization and structure in experimental brain tumors: microvessel populations with distinctive structural and functional properties. Microvasc Res. 1999; 58(3):312-28. DOI: 10.1006/mvre.1999.2188. View

3.
Rahman A, Lafon B, Parra L, Bikson M . Direct current stimulation boosts synaptic gain and cooperativity in vitro. J Physiol. 2017; 595(11):3535-3547. PMC: 5451737. DOI: 10.1113/JP273005. View

4.
Daffertshofer M, Hennerici M . Cerebrovascular regulation and vasoneuronal coupling. J Clin Ultrasound. 1995; 23(2):125-38. DOI: 10.1002/jcu.1870230207. View

5.
Stagg C, Antal A, Nitsche M . Physiology of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation. J ECT. 2018; 34(3):144-152. DOI: 10.1097/YCT.0000000000000510. View