» Articles » PMID: 29915178

Direct Current Stimulation of Endothelial Monolayers Induces a Transient and Reversible Increase in Transport Due to the Electroosmotic Effect

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2018 Jun 20
PMID 29915178
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We investigated the effects of direct current stimulation (DCS) on fluid and solute transport across endothelial cell (EC) monolayers in vitro. Our motivation was transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) that has been investigated for treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders, to enhance neurorehabilitation, and to change cognition in healthy subjects. The mechanisms underlying this diversity of applications remain under investigation. To address the possible role of blood-brain barrier (BBB) changes during tDCS, we applied direct current to cultured EC monolayers in a specially designed chamber that generated spatially uniform direct current. DCS induced fluid and solute movement across EC layers that persisted only for the duration of the stimulation suggesting an electroosmosis mechanism. The direction of induced transport reversed with DCS polarity - a hallmark of the electroosmotic effect. The magnitude of DCS-induced flow was linearly correlated to the magnitude of the applied current. A mathematical model based on a two-pore description of the endothelial transport barrier and a Helmholtz model of the electrical double layer describes the experimental data accurately and predicts enhanced significance of this mechanism in less permeable monolayers. This study demonstrates that DCS transiently alters the transport function of the BBB suggesting a new adjunct mechanism of tDCS.

Citing Articles

Breaking barriers: exploring mechanisms behind opening the blood-brain barrier.

Stamp M, Halwes M, Nisbet D, Collins D Fluids Barriers CNS. 2023; 20(1):87.

PMID: 38017530 PMC: 10683235. DOI: 10.1186/s12987-023-00489-2.


Less might be more: 1 mA but not 1.5 mA of tDCS improves tactile orientation discrimination.

Khalil R, Karim A, Godde B IBRO Neurosci Rep. 2023; 15:186-192.

PMID: 37746157 PMC: 10511473. DOI: 10.1016/j.ibneur.2023.08.003.


Multi-scale multi-physics model of brain interstitial water flux by transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.

Khadka N, Poon C, Cancel L, Tarbell J, Bikson M J Neural Eng. 2023; 20(4).

PMID: 37413982 PMC: 10996349. DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ace4f4.


Cytoskeletal Remodeling and Gap Junction Translocation Mediates Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption by Non-invasive Low-Voltage Pulsed Electric Fields.

Rajagopalan N, Vista W, Fujimori M, Vroomen L, Jimenez J, Khadka N Ann Biomed Eng. 2023; 52(1):89-102.

PMID: 37115366 DOI: 10.1007/s10439-023-03211-3.


Is blood-brain barrier a probable mediator of non-invasive brain stimulation effects on Alzheimer's disease?.

Petrovskaya A, Tverskoi A, Medvedeva A, Nazarova M Commun Biol. 2023; 6(1):416.

PMID: 37059824 PMC: 10104838. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-023-04717-1.


References
1.
Giovannella M, Ibanez D, Gregori-Pla C, Kacprzak M, Mitja G, Ruffini G . Concurrent measurement of cerebral hemodynamics and electroencephalography during transcranial direct current stimulation. Neurophotonics. 2018; 5(1):015001. PMC: 5784784. DOI: 10.1117/1.NPh.5.1.015001. View

2.
Maneshi M, Sachs F, Hua S . A Threshold Shear Force for Calcium Influx in an Astrocyte Model of Traumatic Brain Injury. J Neurotrauma. 2014; 32(13):1020-9. PMC: 4492552. DOI: 10.1089/neu.2014.3677. View

3.
Jalali R, Chowdhury A, Wilson M, Miall R, Galea J . Neural changes associated with cerebellar tDCS studied using MR spectroscopy. Exp Brain Res. 2018; 236(4):997-1006. PMC: 5887008. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-018-5170-1. View

4.
Esmaeilpour Z, Marangolo P, Hampstead B, Bestmann S, Galletta E, Knotkova H . Incomplete evidence that increasing current intensity of tDCS boosts outcomes. Brain Stimul. 2017; 11(2):310-321. PMC: 7050474. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.12.002. View

5.
Chien S, Li S, Shyy Y . Effects of mechanical forces on signal transduction and gene expression in endothelial cells. Hypertension. 1998; 31(1 Pt 2):162-9. DOI: 10.1161/01.hyp.31.1.162. View