Fractal Dimension, Lacunarity, and Cortical Thickness in the Mandible: Analyzing Differences Between Healthy Men and Women with Cone-beam Computed Tomography

Overview

Journal Imaging Sci Dent

Specialty Radiology

Date 2023 Jul 5

PMID 37405205

Authors

Ingrid Garcia Santos

Fernanda Ramos de Faria

Marcio Jose da Silva Campos

Beatriz Alvares Cabral de Barros

Gustavo Davi Rabelo

Karina Lopes Devito

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: The objective of this study was to assess the fractal dimension, lacunarity, trabecular microarchitecture parameters, and cortical linear measurements in the mandibles of male and female individuals to identify differences between them.

Materials And Methods: In total, 116 cone-beam computed tomography scans of healthy individuals of different ages (57 men and 59 women, aged between 20 and 60 years) were selected. The following bone parameters were measured: 1) buccal, lingual, and basal cortical bone thickness in 5 standard parasagittal sections (the midline, the left and right sides of the lower lateral incisors, and the left and right sides of the lower canines); 2) the bone volume fraction of 10 sequential axial sections from each patient by creating a volume of interest in the area between the lower canines; and 3) fractal dimension and lacunarity using grayscale images of the same region of the volume of interest in the anterior mandible. Spearman correlation coefficients and the Mann-Whitney test were used.

Results: A significant and positive correlation was found between age and cortical thickness, especially in the region of the central incisors. Significant differences between sexes in terms of fractal dimension, lacunarity, and bone volume were found. Women revealed lower fractal dimension values and higher lacunarity and bone volume ratio values than men.

Conclusion: Fractal dimension, lacunarity, trabecular bone volume, and cortical thickness were different between men and women of different ages.

Citing Articles

Fractal analysis of jawbone structure in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Celebi E, Gormez O, Dogru A, Aydogan T, Orhan H Imaging Sci Dent. 2025; 54(4):345-353.

PMID: 39744549 PMC: 11685309. DOI: 10.5624/isd.20240065.

The effect of mentoplate application on the condyle.

Tekin G, Kocak A, Kuleli B, Ozturk T, Dereci O, Saruhan Kose N BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):722.

PMID: 38915000 PMC: 11194891. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-04506-0.

Titanium Alloy Implants with Lattice Structures for Mandibular Reconstruction.

Hijazi K, Dixon S, Armstrong J, Rizkalla A Materials (Basel). 2024; 17(1).

PMID: 38203994 PMC: 10779528. DOI: 10.3390/ma17010140.

References

He R, Tu M, Huang H, Tsai M, Wu J, Hsu J . Improving the prediction of the trabecular bone microarchitectural parameters using dental cone-beam computed tomography. BMC Med Imaging. 2019; 19(1):10. PMC: 6343305. DOI: 10.1186/s12880-019-0313-9. View

Scarfe W, Farman A, Sukovic P . Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice. J Can Dent Assoc. 2006; 72(1):75-80. View

Nishiyama K, Macdonald H, Hanley D, Boyd S . Women with previous fragility fractures can be classified based on bone microarchitecture and finite element analysis measured with HR-pQCT. Osteoporos Int. 2012; 24(5):1733-40. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-012-2160-1. View

Ling H, Yang X, Li P, Megalooikonomou V, Xu Y, Yang J . Cross gender-age trabecular texture analysis in cone beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2014; 43(4):20130324. PMC: 4082259. DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20130324. View

Mello-Gentil T, Souza-Mello V . Contributions of anatomy to forensic sex estimation: focus on head and neck bones. Forensic Sci Res. 2022; 7(1):11-23. PMC: 8942509. DOI: 10.1080/20961790.2021.1889136. View

Tunis T, Sarig R, Cohen H, Medlej B, Peled N, May H . Sex estimation using computed tomography of the mandible. Int J Legal Med. 2017; 131(6):1691-1700. DOI: 10.1007/s00414-017-1554-1. View

Eastell R, ONeill T, Hofbauer L, Langdahl B, Reid I, Gold D . Postmenopausal osteoporosis. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016; 2:16069. DOI: 10.1038/nrdp.2016.69. View

SMITH Jr T, Lange G, Marks W . Fractal methods and results in cellular morphology--dimensions, lacunarity and multifractals. J Neurosci Methods. 1996; 69(2):123-36. DOI: 10.1016/S0165-0270(96)00080-5. View

G V, Gowri S R M, J A . Sex determination of human mandible using metrical parameters. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014; 7(12):2671-3. PMC: 3919368. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2013/7621.3728. View

10.

Kim J, Yi W, Heo M, Lee S, Choi S, Huh K . Three-dimensional evaluation of human jaw bone microarchitecture: correlation between the microarchitectural parameters of cone beam computed tomography and micro-computer tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2015; 120(6):762-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2015.08.022. View

11.

Blumer M . Bone tissue and histological and molecular events during development of the long bones. Ann Anat. 2021; 235:151704. DOI: 10.1016/j.aanat.2021.151704. View

12.

Almeida M, Laurent M, Dubois V, Claessens F, OBrien C, Bouillon R . Estrogens and Androgens in Skeletal Physiology and Pathophysiology. Physiol Rev. 2016; 97(1):135-187. PMC: 5539371. DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00033.2015. View

13.

Alman A, Johnson L, Calverley D, Grunwald G, Lezotte D, Hokanson J . Diagnostic capabilities of fractal dimension and mandibular cortical width to identify men and women with decreased bone mineral density. Osteoporos Int. 2011; 23(5):1631-6. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-011-1678-y. View

14.

Van Dessel J, Nicolielo L, Huang Y, Coudyzer W, Salmon B, Lambrichts I . Accuracy and reliability of different cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) devices for structural analysis of alveolar bone in comparison with multislice CT and micro-CT. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2017; 10(1):95-105. View

15.

da Silva M, Dos Santos H, Ruhland L, Rabelo G, Badaro M . Fractal analysis of dental periapical radiographs: A revised image processing method. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2023; 135(5):669-677. DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2022.11.014. View

16.

Franciotti R, Moharrami M, Quaranta A, Bizzoca M, Piattelli A, Aprile G . Use of fractal analysis in dental images for osteoporosis detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int. 2021; 32(6):1041-1052. PMC: 8128830. DOI: 10.1007/s00198-021-05852-3. View

17.

Pauwels R, Faruangsaeng T, Charoenkarn T, Ngonphloy N, Panmekiate S . Effect of exposure parameters and voxel size on bone structure analysis in CBCT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015; 44(8):20150078. PMC: 4628422. DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20150078. View

18.

Spradley M, Jantz R . Sex estimation in forensic anthropology: skull versus postcranial elements. J Forensic Sci. 2011; 56(2):289-96. DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01635.x. View

19.

Kato C, Barra S, Tavares N, Amaral T, Brasileiro C, Mesquita R . Use of fractal analysis in dental images: a systematic review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2019; 49(2):20180457. PMC: 7026934. DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20180457. View

20.

Hazari P, Hazari R, Mishra S, Agrawal S, Yadav M . Is there enough evidence so that mandible can be used as a tool for sex dimorphism? A systematic review. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2017; 8(3):174. PMC: 5210109. DOI: 10.4103/0975-1475.195111. View