» Articles » PMID: 30674282

Improving the Prediction of the Trabecular Bone Microarchitectural Parameters Using Dental Cone-beam Computed Tomography

Overview
Journal BMC Med Imaging
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Radiology
Date 2019 Jan 25
PMID 30674282
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: In this study, we explored how various preprocessing approaches can be employed to enhance the capability of dental CBCT to accurately estimate trabecular bone microarchitectural parameters.

Methods: In total, 30 bovine vertebrae cancellous bone specimens were used for in study. Voxel resolution 18-μm micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) and 100-μm dental CBCT were used to scan each specimen. Micro-CT images were used to calculate trabecular bone microarchitectural parameters; the results were set as the gold standard. Subsequently, before the dental CBCT images were converted into binary images to calculate trabecular bone microarchitectural parameters, three preprocessing approaches were used to process the dental CBCT images. For Group 1, no preprocessing approach was applied. For Group 2, images were sharpened and despeckable noises were removed. For Group 3, the function of local thresholding was added to Group 2 to form Group 3. For Group 4, the air pixels was removed from Group 3 to form Group 4. Subsequently, all images were imported into a software package to estimate trabecular bone microarchitectural parameters (bone volume fraction (BV/TV), trabecular thickness (TbTh), trabecular number (TbN), and trabecular separation (TbSp)). Finally, a paired t-test and a Pearson correlation test were performed to compare the capability of micro-CT with the capability of dental CBCT for estimating trabecular bone microarchitectural parameters.

Results: Regardless of whether dental CBCT images underwent image preprocessing (Groups 1 to 4), the four trabecular bone microarchitectural parameters measured using dental CBCT images were significantly different from those measured using micro-CT images. However, after three image preprocessing approaches were applied to the dental CBCT images (Group 4), the BV/TV obtained using dental CBCT was highly positively correlated with that obtained using micro-CT (r = 0.87, p < 0.001); the correlation coefficient was greater than that of Group 1 (r = -0.15, p = 0.412), Group 2 (r = 0.16, p = 0.386), and Group 3 (r = 0.47, p = 0.006). After dental CBCT images underwent image preprocessing, the efficacy of using dental CBCT for estimating TbN and TbSp was enhanced.

Conclusions: Image preprocessing approaches can be used to enhance the efficacy of using dental CBCT for predicting trabecular bone microarchitectural parameters.

Citing Articles

Clinical Super-Resolution Computed Tomography of Bone Microstructure: Application in Musculoskeletal and Dental Imaging.

Rytky S, Tiulpin A, Finnila M, Karhula S, Sipola A, Kurttila V Ann Biomed Eng. 2024; 52(5):1255-1269.

PMID: 38361137 PMC: 10995025. DOI: 10.1007/s10439-024-03450-y.


Assessment of the osteogenic effect after maxillary sinus floor elevation and simultaneous implantation with or without bone grafts by analyzing trabecular bone parameters: a retrospective study.

Wang M, Li B, Feng H, Ye Q, Sun Y, Duan X J Appl Oral Sci. 2024; 32:e20230406.

PMID: 38359269 PMC: 10984575. DOI: 10.1590/1678-7757-2023-0406.


Cone-Beam Computed Tomography to evaluate changes in trabecular lower jawbone microstructure caused by bone loss and antiresorptive treatment.

Avendano M, Bonanno M, Zeni Coronel E, Marotte C, Zeni S, Davison M Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2024; 36(3):131-139.

PMID: 38345274 PMC: 10867850. DOI: 10.54589/aol.36/3/131.


Fractal dimension, lacunarity, and cortical thickness in the mandible: Analyzing differences between healthy men and women with cone-beam computed tomography.

Santos I, Faria F, Campos M, de Barros B, Rabelo G, Devito K Imaging Sci Dent. 2023; 53(2):153-159.

PMID: 37405205 PMC: 10315234. DOI: 10.5624/isd.20230042.


Correlation between gray values in cone-beam computed tomography and histomorphometric analysis.

Anbiaee N, Shafieian R, Shiezadeh F, Shakeri M, Naqipour F Imaging Sci Dent. 2023; 52(4):375-382.

PMID: 36605865 PMC: 9807799. DOI: 10.5624/isd.20220051.


References
1.
Ibrahim N, Parsa A, Hassan B, van der Stelt P, Wismeijer D . Diagnostic imaging of trabecular bone microstructure for oral implants: a literature review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2013; 42(3):20120075. PMC: 3667540. DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20120075. View

2.
Fuh L, Huang H, Chen C, Fu K, Shen Y, Tu M . Variations in bone density at dental implant sites in different regions of the jawbone. J Oral Rehabil. 2010; 37(5):346-51. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02061.x. View

3.
Gibson L . The mechanical behaviour of cancellous bone. J Biomech. 1985; 18(5):317-28. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(85)90287-8. View

4.
Dawood A, Brown J, Sauret-Jackson V, Purkayastha S . Optimization of cone beam CT exposure for pre-surgical evaluation of the implant site. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011; 41(1):70-4. PMC: 3520272. DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/16421849. View

5.
Huang Y, Van Dessel J, Liang X, Depypere M, Zhong W, Ma G . Effects of immediate and delayed loading on peri-implant trabecular structures: a cone beam CT evaluation. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013; 16(6):873-83. DOI: 10.1111/cid.12063. View