» Articles » PMID: 37371722

Plasma Osteopontin Reflects Tissue Damage in Acute Pancreatitis

Overview
Journal Biomedicines
Date 2023 Jun 28
PMID 37371722
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Several scoring systems for clinical prediction of the severity of acute pancreatitis (AP) have been proposed. Yet, there is still a need for an easy-to-measure biomarker. Osteopontin (OPN) may be released to the circulation early during tissue injury, but the significance of OPN in AP has not yet been established. We aimed to evaluate plasma levels of OPN in relation to the severity of AP. In 39 individuals with confirmed AP, plasma was collected on the day of admission and consecutively for three days thereafter. Sex- and age-matched healthy blood donors ( = 39) served as controls. Plasma OPN was measured by a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. At admission, patients with AP displayed higher OPN, 156.4 ng/mL (IQR 111.8-196.2) compared to controls, 37.4 ng/mL (IQR 11.7-65.7) ( < 0.0001). However, OPN levels on admission could not discriminate between mild and moderate-to-severe disease (132.6 ng/mL vs. 163.4 ng/mL). Nevertheless, the changes in OPN within 24 h of admission and Day 2/3 were higher among patients with moderate/severe AP (33.7%) compared to mild AP (-8.1%) ( = 0.01). This indicates that OPN is a relevant biomarker reflecting tissue injury in AP. The increase in OPN over time suggests that serial OPN measurements could contribute to the early detection of at-risk patients. Prospective studies assessing OPN in relation to outcome in AP are warranted.

Citing Articles

Osteopontin: A Versatile Biomarker-Insights and Innovations from Three Decades of Research.

Abreu H, Cappellano G Biomedicines. 2024; 12(8).

PMID: 39200112 PMC: 11352076. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12081647.


Adipokines and their role in acute pancreatitis.

Rafaqat S, Radoman-Vujacic I, Patoulias D, Khurshid H, Klisic A J Med Biochem. 2024; 43(4):512-527.

PMID: 39139157 PMC: 11318933. DOI: 10.5937/jomb0-47515.

References
1.
Banks P, Bollen T, Dervenis C, Gooszen H, Johnson C, Sarr M . Classification of acute pancreatitis--2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut. 2012; 62(1):102-11. DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302779. View

2.
Mederos M, Reber H, Girgis M . Acute Pancreatitis: A Review. JAMA. 2021; 325(4):382-390. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2020.20317. View

3.
Kumar A, Singh Griwan M . A comparison of APACHE II, BISAP, Ranson's score and modified CTSI in predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis based on the 2012 revised Atlanta Classification. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2018; 6(2):127-131. PMC: 5952961. DOI: 10.1093/gastro/gox029. View

4.
Ismail O, Bhayana V . Lipase or amylase for the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis?. Clin Biochem. 2017; 50(18):1275-1280. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2017.07.003. View

5.
Charlson M, Pompei P, Ales K, MacKenzie C . A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987; 40(5):373-83. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8. View