» Articles » PMID: 29780601

A Comparison of APACHE II, BISAP, Ranson's Score and Modified CTSI in Predicting the Severity of Acute Pancreatitis Based on the 2012 Revised Atlanta Classification

Overview
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2018 May 22
PMID 29780601
Citations 66
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Our aim was to prospectively compare the Accuracy of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II, Bedside Index of Severity in Acute Pancreatitis (BISAP), Ranson's score and modified Computed Tomography Severity Index (CTSI) in predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis based on Atlanta 2012 definitions in a tertiary care hospital in northern India.

Methods: Fifty patients with acute pancreatitis admitted to our hospital during the period of March 2015 to September 2016 were included in the study. APACHE II, BISAP and Ranson's score were calculated for all the cases. Modified CTSI was also determined based on a pancreatic protocol contrast enhanced computerized tomography (CT). Optimal cut-offs for these scoring systems and the area under the curve (AUC) were evaluated based on the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve and these scoring systems were compared prospectively.

Results: Of the 50 cases, 14 were graded as severe acute pancreatitis. Pancreatic necrosis was present in 15 patients, while 14 developed persistent organ failure and 14 needed intensive care unit (ICU) admission. The AUC for modified CTSI was consistently the highest for predicting severe acute pancreatitis (0.919), pancreatic necrosis (0.993), organ failure (0.893) and ICU admission (0.993). APACHE II was the second most accurate in predicting severe acute pancreatitis (AUC 0.834) and organ failure (0.831). APACHE II had a high sensitivity for predicting pancreatic necrosis (93.33%), organ failure (92.86%) and ICU admission (92.31%), and also had a high negative predictive value for predicting pancreatic necrosis (96.15%), organ failure (96.15%) and ICU admission (95.83%).

Conclusion: APACHE II is a useful prognostic scoring system for predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis and can be a crucial aid in determining the group of patients that have a high chance of need for tertiary care during the course of their illness and therefore need early resuscitation and prompt referral, especially in resource-limited developing countries.

Citing Articles

Serum Lactate Dehydrogenase Levels: The Grim Reaper Sign in Acute Pancreatitis?.

Trad G, Hoekstra J, Haddadin R, Shetty K, Ryan J J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2025; 15(1):8-12.

PMID: 39867161 PMC: 11759084. DOI: 10.55729/2000-9666.1430.


Artificial intelligence models assisting physicians in quantifying pancreatic necrosis in acute pancreatitis.

Lu C, Zhou J, Feng Y, Meng S, Guo X, Su W Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2025; 15(1):135-148.

PMID: 39839053 PMC: 11744103. DOI: 10.21037/qims-24-841.


Turkish Society of Gastroenterology: Pancreas Working Group, Acute Pancreatitis Committee Consensus Report.

Ogutmen Koc D, Bengi G, Gul O, Ozen Alahdab Y, Altintas E, Barutcu S Turk J Gastroenterol. 2024; 35(Suppl 1):S1-S44.

PMID: 39599919 PMC: 11670795. DOI: 10.5152/tjg.2024.24392.


Application of alkaline phosphatase-to-hemoglobin and lactate dehydrogenase-to-hemoglobin ratios as novel noninvasive indices for predicting severe acute pancreatitis in patients.

Chen S, Song X, Lu J, Liang J, Ouyang H, Zheng W PLoS One. 2024; 19(11):e0312181.

PMID: 39561130 PMC: 11575775. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312181.


Analysis of factors associated with Helicobacter pylori infection in severe pancreatitis patients and its effect on patient's prognosis.

He W, Zhang Y Am J Transl Res. 2024; 16(8):4011-4019.

PMID: 39262733 PMC: 11384374. DOI: 10.62347/JKEF1700.


References
1.
Forsmark C, Baillie J . AGA Institute technical review on acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterology. 2007; 132(5):2022-44. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.03.065. View

2.
Khanna A, Meher S, Prakash S, Tiwary S, Singh U, Srivastava A . Comparison of Ranson, Glasgow, MOSS, SIRS, BISAP, APACHE-II, CTSI Scores, IL-6, CRP, and Procalcitonin in Predicting Severity, Organ Failure, Pancreatic Necrosis, and Mortality in Acute Pancreatitis. HPB Surg. 2013; 2013:367581. PMC: 3800571. DOI: 10.1155/2013/367581. View

3.
Banday I, Gattoo I, Khan A, Javeed J, Gupta G, Latief M . Modified Computed Tomography Severity Index for Evaluation of Acute Pancreatitis and its Correlation with Clinical Outcome: A Tertiary Care Hospital Based Observational Study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015; 9(8):TC01-5. PMC: 4576607. DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/14824.6368. View

4.
Brivet F, Emilie D, Galanaud P . Pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines during acute severe pancreatitis: an early and sustained response, although unpredictable of death. Parisian Study Group on Acute Pancreatitis. Crit Care Med. 1999; 27(4):749-55. DOI: 10.1097/00003246-199904000-00029. View

5.
Balthazar E, Freeny P, Vansonnenberg E . Imaging and intervention in acute pancreatitis. Radiology. 1994; 193(2):297-306. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.193.2.7972730. View