» Articles » PMID: 37341774

Assessing the Toxicity After Moderately Hypofractionated Prostate and Whole Pelvis Radiotherapy Compared to Conventional Fractionation

Overview
Specialties Oncology
Radiology
Date 2023 Jun 21
PMID 37341774
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To evaluate acute and late gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicities after moderately hypofractionated (HF) or conventionally fractionated (CF) primary whole-pelvis radiotherapy (WPRT).

Methods: Primary prostate-cancer patients treated between 2009 and 2021 with either 60 Gy at 3 Gy/fraction to the prostate and 46 Gy at 2.3 Gy/fraction to the whole pelvis (HF), or 78 Gy at 2 Gy/fraction to the prostate and 50/50.4 Gy at 1.8-2 Gy/fraction to the whole pelvis (CF). Acute and late GI and GU toxicities were retrospectively assessed.

Results: 106 patients received HF and 157 received CF, with a median follow-up of 12 and 57 months. Acute GI toxicity rates in the HF and CF groups were, respectively, grade 2: 46.7% vs. 37.6%, and grade 3: 0% vs. 1.3%, with no significant difference (p = 0.71). Acute GU toxicity rates were, respectively, grade 2: 20.0% vs. 31.8%, and grade 3: 2.9% vs. 0%, (p = 0.04). We compared prevalence of late GI and GU toxicities between groups after 3, 12, and 24 months and did not find any significant differences (respectively, p = 0.59, 0.22, and 0.71 for GI toxicity; p = 0.39, 0.58, and 0.90 for GU toxicity).

Conclusion: Moderate HF WPRT was well tolerated during the first 2 years. Randomized trials are needed to confirm these findings.

References
1.
Faria S, Ruo R, Perna M, Cury F, Duclos M, Sarshoghi A . Long-Term Results of Moderate Hypofractionation to Prostate and Pelvic Nodes Plus Androgen Suppression in High-Risk Prostate Cancer. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2020; 10(6):e514-e520. DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2020.06.012. View

2.
Cox J, Stetz J, Pajak T . Toxicity criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995; 31(5):1341-6. DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(95)00060-C. View

3.
Dearnaley D, Syndikus I, Sumo G, Bidmead M, Bloomfield D, Clark C . Conventional versus hypofractionated high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: preliminary safety results from the CHHiP randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2011; 13(1):43-54. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70293-5. View

4.
Hall W, Paulson E, Davis B, Spratt D, Morgan T, Dearnaley D . NRG Oncology Updated International Consensus Atlas on Pelvic Lymph Node Volumes for Intact and Postoperative Prostate Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020; 109(1):174-185. PMC: 7736505. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.08.034. View

5.
Pommier P, Chabaud S, Lagrange J, Richaud P, Le Prise E, Wagner J . Is There a Role for Pelvic Irradiation in Localized Prostate Adenocarcinoma? Update of the Long-Term Survival Results of the GETUG-01 Randomized Study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016; 96(4):759-769. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.06.2455. View