» Articles » PMID: 36653352

Effects of Gold Fiducial Marker Implantation on Tumor Control and Toxicity in External Beam Radiotherapy of Prostate Cancer

Overview
Journal Radiol Oncol
Publisher Sciendo
Specialties Oncology
Radiology
Date 2023 Jan 18
PMID 36653352
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Evidence regarding the effects of fiducials in image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) for tumor control and acute and late toxicity is sparse.

Patients And Methods: Patients with primary low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer, 40 with and 21 without gold fiducial markers (GFM), and treated between 2010 and 2015 were retrospectively included. The decision for or against GFM implantation took anaesthetic evaluation and patient choice into account. IGRT was performed using electronic portal imaging devices. The prescribed dose was 78 Gy, with 2 Gy per fraction. Biochemical no evidence of disease (bNED) failure was defined using the Phoenix criteria. Acute and late gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary toxicity (GU) were assessed using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group criteria.

Results: Most patients did not receive GFM due to contraindications for anaesthesia or personal choice (60% and 25%). Regarding tumor control, no significant differences were found regarding bNED and overall and disease-specific survival ( = 0.61, = 0.56, and > 0.9999, respectively). No significant differences in acute and late GI (p = 0.16 and 0.64) and GU toxicity ( = 0.58 and 0.80) were observed.

Conclusions: We were unable to detect significant benefits in bNED or in early or late GI and GU side effects after GFM implantation.

Citing Articles

Assessing the toxicity after moderately hypofractionated prostate and whole pelvis radiotherapy compared to conventional fractionation.

Moll M, Goldner G Strahlenther Onkol. 2023; 200(3):188-194.

PMID: 37341774 PMC: 10876811. DOI: 10.1007/s00066-023-02104-7.

References
1.
Wortel R, Incrocci L, Pos F, van der Heide U, Lebesque J, Aluwini S . Late Side Effects After Image Guided Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Compared to 3D-Conformal Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Results From 2 Prospective Cohorts. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016; 95(2):680-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.01.031. View

2.
Cox J, Stetz J, Pajak T . Toxicity criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995; 31(5):1341-6. DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(95)00060-C. View

3.
Napieralska A, Majewski W, Kulik R, Glowacki G, Miszczyk L . A comparison of treatment outcome between fiducial-based and bone-based image guided radiotherapy in prostate cancer patients. Radiat Oncol. 2018; 13(1):235. PMC: 6258434. DOI: 10.1186/s13014-018-1171-2. View

4.
Roach 3rd M, Hanks G, Thames Jr H, Schellhammer P, Shipley W, Sokol G . Defining biochemical failure following radiotherapy with or without hormonal therapy in men with clinically localized prostate cancer: recommendations of the RTOG-ASTRO Phoenix Consensus Conference. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006; 65(4):965-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.04.029. View

5.
Singh J, Greer P, White M, Parker J, Patterson J, Tang C . Treatment-related morbidity in prostate cancer: a comparison of 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy with and without image guidance using implanted fiducial markers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012; 85(4):1018-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.07.2376. View