» Articles » PMID: 37340436

The Effect of Gum Chewing on Xerostomia and Salivary Flow Rate in Elderly and Medically Compromised Subjects: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal BMC Oral Health
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2023 Jun 20
PMID 37340436
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Xerostomia negatively affects quality of life. Symptoms include oral dryness; thirst; difficulty speaking, chewing, and swallowing food; oral discomfort; mouth soft tissue soreness and infections; and rampant tooth decay. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate if gum chewing is an intervention that results in objective improvements in salivary flow rates and subjective relief from xerostomia.

Method: We searched electronic databases including Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library (CDSR and Central), Google Scholar and the citations of review papers (last searched 31/03/23). The study populations included: 1) elderly people with xerostomia (> 60 years old, any gender, and severity of xerostomia), and 2) medically compromised people with xerostomia. The intervention of interest was gum chewing. Comparisons included gum chewing vs. no gum chewing. The outcomes included salivary flow rate, self-reported xerostomia, and thirst. All settings and study designs were included. We conducted a meta-analysis on studies where measurements of unstimulated whole salivary flow rate for both a gum chewing, and no gum chewing intervention (daily chewing of gum for two weeks or longer) were reported. We assessed risk of bias using Cochrane's RoB 2 and ROBINS-I tools.

Results: Nine thousand six hundred and two studies were screened and 0.26% (n = 25) met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review. Two of the 25 papers had a high overall risk of bias. Of the 25 papers selected for the systematic review, six met the criteria to be included in the meta-analysis which confirmed a significant overall effect of gum on saliva flow outcomes compared to control (SMD = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.22-0.66; p = 0.00008; I = 46.53%).

Conclusions: Chewing gum can increase unstimulated salivary flow rate in elderly and medically compromised people with xerostomia. Increasing the number of days over which gum is chewed increases the improvement in the rate of salivation. Gum chewing is linked with improvements in self-reported levels of xerostomia (although it is noted that no significant effects were detected in five of the studies reviewed). Future studies should eliminate sources of bias, standardise methods to measure salivary flow rate, and use a common instrument to measure subjective relief from xerostomia.

Study Registration: PROSPERO CRD42021254485.

Citing Articles

Oral Mycobiome Alterations in Postmenopausal Women: Links to Inflammation, Xerostomia, and Systemic Health.

Bogdan-Andreescu C, Banateanu A, Albu C, Poalelungi C, Botoaca O, Damian C Biomedicines. 2024; 12(11).

PMID: 39595135 PMC: 11592264. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12112569.


Effects of Self-Perceived Oral Health and Stress Levels on Subjective Oral Symptoms and Lifestyle of University Students in South Korea: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

Jung Y, Jeong J Res Sq. 2024; .

PMID: 39372945 PMC: 11451721. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-4906078/v1.


Oral discomfort and health behavior of patients with typical vs. atypical antipsychotic drugs.

Meurman J, Murtomaa H Front Psychiatry. 2024; 15:1420010.

PMID: 38988734 PMC: 11233755. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1420010.


Formulation Consideration of Medicated Chewing Gum: A Review.

Bobe K, Suryawanshi Y, Gomase V, Kachhi M, Bobade C Recent Adv Drug Deliv Formul. 2024; 18(2):100-109.

PMID: 38638041 DOI: 10.2174/0126673878281000240411073412.


Pregnancy-related dental problems: A review.

Islam N, Haque A Heliyon. 2024; 10(3):e24259.

PMID: 38322854 PMC: 10845246. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24259.


References
1.
Risheim H, Arneberg P . Salivary stimulation by chewing gum and lozenges in rheumatic patients with xerostomia. Scand J Dent Res. 1993; 101(1):40-3. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1993.tb01644.x. View

2.
Haidich A . Meta-analysis in medical research. Hippokratia. 2011; 14(Suppl 1):29-37. PMC: 3049418. View

3.
Liu G, Qiu X, Tan X, Miao R, Tian W, Jing W . Efficacy of a 1% malic acid spray for xerostomia treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Oral Dis. 2021; 29(3):862-872. DOI: 10.1111/odi.14116. View

4.
Allida S, Shehab S, Inglis S, Davidson P, Hayward C, Newton P . A RandomisEd ControLled TrIal of ChEwing Gum to RelieVE Thirst in Chronic Heart Failure (RELIEVE-CHF). Heart Lung Circ. 2020; 30(4):516-524. DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2020.09.004. View

5.
Al-Haboubi M, Zoitopoulos L, Beighton D, Gallagher J . The potential benefits of sugar-free chewing gum on the oral health and quality of life of older people living in the community: a randomized controlled trial. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2012; 40(5):415-24. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2012.00685.x. View