» Articles » PMID: 21487488

Meta-analysis in Medical Research

Overview
Journal Hippokratia
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2011 Apr 14
PMID 21487488
Citations 306
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The objectives of this paper are to provide an introduction to meta-analysis and to discuss the rationale for this type of research and other general considerations. Methods used to produce a rigorous meta-analysis are highlighted and some aspects of presentation and interpretation of meta-analysis are discussed.Meta-analysis is a quantitative, formal, epidemiological study design used to systematically assess previous research studies to derive conclusions about that body of research. Outcomes from a meta-analysis may include a more precise estimate of the effect of treatment or risk factor for disease, or other outcomes, than any individual study contributing to the pooled analysis. The examination of variability or heterogeneity in study results is also a critical outcome. The benefits of meta-analysis include a consolidated and quantitative review of a large, and often complex, sometimes apparently conflicting, body of literature. The specification of the outcome and hypotheses that are tested is critical to the conduct of meta-analyses, as is a sensitive literature search. A failure to identify the majority of existing studies can lead to erroneous conclusions; however, there are methods of examining data to identify the potential for studies to be missing; for example, by the use of funnel plots. Rigorously conducted meta-analyses are useful tools in evidence-based medicine. The need to integrate findings from many studies ensures that meta-analytic research is desirable and the large body of research now generated makes the conduct of this research feasible.

Citing Articles

Healthcare research and education: actively constructed research knowledge-a model for online systematic reviews and meta-analyses courses.

El Ansari W, El-Ansari K, Hany M BMC Res Notes. 2025; 18(1):103.

PMID: 40065351 PMC: 11895192. DOI: 10.1186/s13104-025-07111-8.


Fixed-effect versus random-effect model in meta-analysis: How to decide?.

Maitra S Indian J Anaesth. 2025; 69(1):143-146.

PMID: 40046706 PMC: 11878354. DOI: 10.4103/ija.ija_1203_24.


Global prevalence of species in goats: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ali E, Ghafar A, Angeles-Hernandez J, Yaseen M, Gauci C, Beveridge I Front Vet Sci. 2025; 11:1537171.

PMID: 39916968 PMC: 11800301. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1537171.


Occupational Exposure to Air Pollutants and Higher Risk of COPD in Construction Workers: A Meta-Analysis Study.

Narayanasamy N, Josyula L Indian J Occup Environ Med. 2025; 28(4):313-318.

PMID: 39877274 PMC: 11771287. DOI: 10.4103/ijoem.ijoem_329_23.


Evaluating GPT Models for Automated Literature Screening in Wastewater-Based Epidemiology.

Chibwe K, Mantilla-Calderon D, Ling F ACS Environ Au. 2025; 5(1):61-68.

PMID: 39830716 PMC: 11741058. DOI: 10.1021/acsenvironau.4c00042.


References
1.
Higgins J, Thompson S . Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002; 21(11):1539-58. DOI: 10.1002/sim.1186. View

2.
Egger M, Smith G, Phillips A . Meta-analysis: principles and procedures. BMJ. 1998; 315(7121):1533-7. PMC: 2127925. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.315.7121.1533. View

3.
Greenland S . Invited commentary: a critical look at some popular meta-analytic methods. Am J Epidemiol. 1994; 140(3):290-6. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117248. View

4.
Nuesch E, Trelle S, Reichenbach S, Rutjes A, Burgi E, Scherer M . The effects of excluding patients from the analysis in randomised controlled trials: meta-epidemiological study. BMJ. 2009; 339:b3244. PMC: 2739282. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.b3244. View

5.
Juni P, Altman D, Egger M . Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. BMJ. 2001; 323(7303):42-6. PMC: 1120670. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.323.7303.42. View