Global Trends in Semen Quality of Young Men: a Systematic Review and Regression Analysis

Overview

Journal J Assist Reprod Genet

Publisher Springer

Specialties Genetics
Reproductive Medicine

Date 2023 Jun 19

PMID 37335419

Authors

Xuefeng Luo

Chongyang Yin

Yuqing Shi

Chengchao Du

Xiangcheng Pan

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: Many studies have reported declines in semen quality mainly focused on total sperm counts (TSC) and sperm concentration (SC), ignoring the importance of progressive motile sperm (PR), total motile sperm (TM), and normal morphological sperm (NM). Therefore, we performed a comprehensive meta-analysis to explore the trend in semen quality of young men.

Methods: We searched 3 English databases and 4 Chinese databases from January 1980 to August 2022. Random-effect meta-analyses and weighted linear regression models were conducted to perform the trend in semen quality.

Results: Finally, 162 eligible studies including 264,665 men from 28 countries were got between 1978 and 2021. Significant decreases were observed in TSC (- 3.06 million/year, 95% CI - 3.28 to - 2.84), SC (- 0.47 million/ml/year, 95% CI - 0.51 to - 0.43), and PR (- 0.15%/year, 95% CI - 0.20 to - 0.09), and there was an upward trend in TM (0.28%/year, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.32). The results of meta-regression analyses indicated that age, continent, income, WHO criteria, and abstinence time significantly impacted on TSC, SC, PR, and TM. Positive regression coefficients were observed in some categories suggesting that outcomes might not be declining and even increasing in these subgroups.

Conclusions: Downward trends in semen quality among global young men were observed in our study, including TSC, SC, and PR. But TM did not appear to be trending down or even to be leveling off. More studies are needed to focus on the causes of the declines.

Citing Articles

Microplastic exposure is associated with male reproductive health.

Liu W, Qu Z, Wang X, Feng H, Ma S, Zheng Y Med Rev (2021). 2024; 4(6):549-552.

PMID: 39664079 PMC: 11629307. DOI: 10.1515/mr-2024-0069.

Association Between Dietary Habits and the Semen Quality of South Asian Men Attending Fertility Clinic: A Cross-sectional Study.

Chakraborty J, Gowri M, Joseph T, Babuji M, Kavitha K, Kunjummen A Reprod Sci. 2024; 31(11):3368-3378.

PMID: 39365422 DOI: 10.1007/s43032-024-01710-9.

Oxidative Stress-Associated Male Infertility: Current Diagnostic and Therapeutic Approaches.

Pavuluri H, Bakhtiary Z, Panner Selvam M, Hellstrom W Medicina (Kaunas). 2024; 60(6).

PMID: 38929625 PMC: 11205999. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60061008.

What is driving the global decline of human fertility? Need for a multidisciplinary approach to the underlying mechanisms.

Aitken R Front Reprod Health. 2024; 6:1364352.

PMID: 38726051 PMC: 11079147. DOI: 10.3389/frph.2024.1364352.

Impact of Season Variation on Semen Quality: A Comprehensive Retrospective Analysis of Data From Patients at an Eastern Iranian Tertiary Care Fertility Center Over a Decade.

Pakmanesh H, Nazarirobati N, Dabiri S, Mirshekari T, Eslami N, Torabinavid P Am J Mens Health. 2024; 18(2):15579883241237505.

PMID: 38509696 PMC: 10956154. DOI: 10.1177/15579883241237505.

References

Merzenich H, Zeeb H, Blettner M . Decreasing sperm quality: a global problem?. BMC Public Health. 2010; 10:24. PMC: 2818620. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-24. View

Ferlin A, Garolla A, Ghezzi M, Selice R, Palego P, Caretta N . Sperm Count and Hypogonadism as Markers of General Male Health. Eur Urol Focus. 2019; 7(1):205-213. DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2019.08.001. View

SENGUPTA P, Borges Jr E, Dutta S, Krajewska-Kulak E . Decline in sperm count in European men during the past 50 years. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2017; 37(3):247-255. DOI: 10.1177/0960327117703690. View

Ren W, Qu J, Xue B, Hu J, Zu X . Infertility duration and pre-operative sperm progressive motility are significant factors of spontaneous pregnancy after varicocele repair. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2020; 84(6):e13318. DOI: 10.1111/aji.13318. View

Cannarella R, Condorelli R, Gusmano C, Barone N, Burrello N, Aversa A . Temporal Trend of Conventional Sperm Parameters in a Sicilian Population in the Decade 2011-2020. J Clin Med. 2021; 10(5). PMC: 7957883. DOI: 10.3390/jcm10050993. View

Muller A, de La Rochebrochard E, Labbe-Decleves C, Jouannet P, Bujan L, Mieusset R . Selection bias in semen studies due to self-selection of volunteers. Hum Reprod. 2004; 19(12):2838-44. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deh521. View

Cipriani S, Ricci E, Chiaffarino F, Esposito G, Dalmartello M, La Vecchia C . Trend of change of sperm count and concentration over the last two decades: A systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Andrology. 2023; 11(6):997-1008. DOI: 10.1111/andr.13396. View

Jorgensen N, Andersen A, Eustache F, Irvine D, Suominen J, Petersen J . Regional differences in semen quality in Europe. Hum Reprod. 2001; 16(5):1012-9. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/16.5.1012. View

Wang C, Swerdloff R . Limitations of semen analysis as a test of male fertility and anticipated needs from newer tests. Fertil Steril. 2014; 102(6):1502-7. PMC: 4254491. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.10.021. View

10.

Nallella K, Sharma R, Aziz N, Agarwal A . Significance of sperm characteristics in the evaluation of male infertility. Fertil Steril. 2006; 85(3):629-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.08.024. View

11.

Jorgensen N, Lamb D, Levine H, Pastuszak A, Sigalos J, Swan S . Are worldwide sperm counts declining?. Fertil Steril. 2021; 116(6):1457-1463. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.10.020. View

12.

Lv M, Ge P, Zhang J, Yang Y, Zhou L, Zhou D . Temporal trends in semen concentration and count among 327 373 Chinese healthy men from 1981 to 2019: a systematic review. Hum Reprod. 2021; 36(7):1751-1775. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deab124. View

13.

Gabrielsen J, Tanrikut C . Chronic exposures and male fertility: the impacts of environment, diet, and drug use on spermatogenesis. Andrology. 2016; 4(4):648-61. DOI: 10.1111/andr.12198. View

14.

Luo D, Wan X, Liu J, Tong T . Optimally estimating the sample mean from the sample size, median, mid-range, and/or mid-quartile range. Stat Methods Med Res. 2016; 27(6):1785-1805. DOI: 10.1177/0962280216669183. View

15.

Perheentupa A, Sadov S, Ronka R, Virtanen H, Rodprasert W, Vierula M . Semen quality improves marginally during young adulthood: a longitudinal follow-up study. Hum Reprod. 2016; 31(3):502-10. PMC: 4755441. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dev328. View

16.

Levitas E, Lunenfeld E, Weiss N, Friger M, Har-Vardi I, Koifman A . Relationship between the duration of sexual abstinence and semen quality: analysis of 9,489 semen samples. Fertil Steril. 2005; 83(6):1680-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.12.045. View

17.

Choy J, Eisenberg M . Male infertility as a window to health. Fertil Steril. 2018; 110(5):810-814. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.08.015. View

18.

Johnson S, Dunleavy J, Gemmell N, Nakagawa S . Consistent age-dependent declines in human semen quality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ageing Res Rev. 2014; 19:22-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.arr.2014.10.007. View

19.

Gagnier J, Moher D, Boon H, Beyene J, Bombardier C . Investigating clinical heterogeneity in systematic reviews: a methodologic review of guidance in the literature. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012; 12:111. PMC: 3564789. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-111. View

20.

Swan S, Elkin E, Fenster L . The question of declining sperm density revisited: an analysis of 101 studies published 1934-1996. Environ Health Perspect. 2000; 108(10):961-6. PMC: 1240129. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.00108961. View