» Articles » PMID: 31420804

Attention and Binding in Visual Working Memory: Two Forms of Attention and Two Kinds of Buffer Storage

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialties Psychiatry
Psychology
Date 2019 Aug 18
PMID 31420804
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We review our research on the episodic buffer in the multicomponent model of working memory (Baddeley, 2000), making explicit the influence of Anne Treisman's work on the way our research has developed. The crucial linking theme concerns binding, whereby the individual features of an episode are combined as integrated representations. We summarize a series of experiments on visual working memory that investigated the retention of feature bindings and individual features. The effects of cognitive load, perceptual distraction, prioritization, serial position, and their interactions form a coherent pattern. We interpret our findings as demonstrating contrasting roles of externally driven and internally driven attentional processes, as well as a distinction between visual buffer storage and the focus of attention. Our account has strong links with Treisman's concept of focused attention and aligns with a number of contemporary approaches to visual working memory.

Citing Articles

Neurocognitive dynamics and behavioral differences of symmetry and asymmetry processing in working memory: insights from fNIRS.

Sztuka I, Kuhn S Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):4740.

PMID: 39922837 PMC: 11807122. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-84988-8.


What are the benefits of directed attention within verbal working memory?.

Jeanneret S, Vergauwe E, Hautekiet C, Langerock N Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024; 78(2):337-369.

PMID: 39501579 PMC: 11783979. DOI: 10.1177/17470218241299918.


The multicomponent model of working memory fifty years on.

Hitch G, Allen R, Baddeley A Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2024; 78(2):222-239.

PMID: 39340360 PMC: 11783980. DOI: 10.1177/17470218241290909.


The Mixed Role of Sleep and Time of Day in Working Memory Performance of Older Adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment.

Georgoudas M, Moraitou D, Poptsi E, Tsardoulias E, Kesanli D, Papaliagkas V Healthcare (Basel). 2024; 12(16).

PMID: 39201180 PMC: 11353340. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12161622.


Unraveling the binding problem in working memory: insights from the hierarchical binding model.

Gao Z, Shen M Cogn Process. 2024; 25(Suppl 1):97-104.

PMID: 39123055 DOI: 10.1007/s10339-024-01210-3.


References
1.
Kirby K, Gerlanc D . BootES: an R package for bootstrap confidence intervals on effect sizes. Behav Res Methods. 2013; 45(4):905-27. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-013-0330-5. View

2.
Humphreys G . Feature confirmation in object perception: Feature integration theory 26 years on from the Treisman Bartlett lecture. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2015; 69(10):1910-40. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2014.988736. View

3.
Awh E, Vogel E, Oh S . Interactions between attention and working memory. Neuroscience. 2005; 139(1):201-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2005.08.023. View

4.
Oberauer K . Removal of irrelevant information from working memory: sometimes fast, sometimes slow, and sometimes not at all. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2018; 1424(1):239-255. DOI: 10.1111/nyas.13603. View

5.
Berry E, Waterman A, Baddeley A, Hitch G, Allen R . The limits of visual working memory in children: Exploring prioritization and recency effects with sequential presentation. Dev Psychol. 2017; 54(2):240-253. DOI: 10.1037/dev0000427. View