» Articles » PMID: 37287515

Quantifying Weight Loss Program Preferences of Men Working in Trade and Labor Occupations: A Discrete Choice Experiment

Overview
Journal Obes Sci Pract
Date 2023 Jun 8
PMID 37287515
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Men who work in skilled and unskilled trades and labor occupations (i.e., blue-collar occupations), have high rates of obesity and associated comorbidities but are underrepresented in weight loss programs. A first step in engaging this group is to better understand their preferences for weight loss programs.

Methods: Respondents were men working in trade and labor occupations, with overweight/obesity, and an interest in losing weight. A discrete choice experiment was developed, and the data were analyzed using mixed logit model. Respondent characteristics were tested as effect modifiers.

Results: Respondents ( = 221, age ( ± SD) 45.0 ± 12.6, BMI 33.3 ± 6.3, 77% non-Hispanic white) working in a variety of occupations (construction 31%, manufacturing 30%, transportation 25%, maintenance/repair 14%) participated in this study. Results indicate preferences for programs that encourage making smaller dietary changes, are delivered online, and do not incorporate competition. Results were consistent across sensitivity analyses and most respondent groups.

Conclusions: The results suggest specific ways to make weight loss programs more appealing to men in trade and labor occupations. Using experimental methods to quantify preferences using larger, more representative samples would further assist in tailoring behavioral weight loss programs for under-reached populations.

Citing Articles

Identifying Preferred Features of Weight Loss Programs for Adults With or at Risk of Type 2 Diabetes: A Discrete Choice Experiment With 3,960 Adults in the U.K.

Buckell J, Mitchell C, Fryer K, Newbert C, Brennan A, Joyce J Diabetes Care. 2024; 47(4):739-746.

PMID: 38377531 PMC: 10973915. DOI: 10.2337/dc23-2019.


Quantifying weight loss program preferences of men working in trade and labor occupations: A discrete choice experiment.

Crane M, Walton S, Suzuki S, Appelhans B Obes Sci Pract. 2023; 9(3):243-252.

PMID: 37287515 PMC: 10242269. DOI: 10.1002/osp4.642.

References
1.
Hauber A, Gonzalez J, Groothuis-Oudshoorn C, Prior T, Marshall D, Cunningham C . Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Discrete Choice Experiments: A Report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Good Research Practices Task Force. Value Health. 2016; 19(4):300-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2016.04.004. View

2.
Hunt K, Wyke S, Gray C, Anderson A, Brady A, Bunn C . A gender-sensitised weight loss and healthy living programme for overweight and obese men delivered by Scottish Premier League football clubs (FFIT): a pragmatic randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2014; 383(9924):1211-21. PMC: 4524002. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62420-4. View

3.
Agley J, Xiao Y, Nolan R, Golzarri-Arroyo L . Quality control questions on Amazon's Mechanical Turk (MTurk): A randomized trial of impact on the USAUDIT, PHQ-9, and GAD-7. Behav Res Methods. 2021; 54(2):885-897. PMC: 8344397. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-021-01665-8. View

4.
Bridges J, Hauber A, Marshall D, Lloyd A, Prosser L, Regier D . Conjoint analysis applications in health--a checklist: a report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force. Value Health. 2011; 14(4):403-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2010.11.013. View

5.
Salampessy B, Veldwijk J, Schuit A, van den Brekel-Dijkstra K, Neslo R, de Wit G . The Predictive Value of Discrete Choice Experiments in Public Health: An Exploratory Application. Patient. 2015; 8(6):521-9. PMC: 4662963. DOI: 10.1007/s40271-015-0115-2. View