» Articles » PMID: 37284020

Access To, Use Of, and Experiences with Social Alarms in Home-living People with Dementia: Results from the LIVE@Home.Path Trial

Overview
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2023 Jun 7
PMID 37284020
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Social alarms are considered an appropriate technology to ensure the safety and independence of older adults, but limited research has been conducted on their actual use. We, therefore, explored the access, experiences, and use of social alarms among home-bound people with dementia and their informal caregivers (dyads).

Methods: From May 2019 to October 2021, the LIVE@Home.Path mixed-method intervention trial collected data from semi-quantitative questionnaires and qualitative interviews conducted among home-dwelling people with dementia and their informal caregivers in Norway. The study focused on data from the final assessment at 24 months.

Results: A total of 278 dyads were included, and 82 participants reached the final assessment. The mean age of the patients was 83 years; 74.6% were female; 50% lived alone; and 58% had their child as a caregiver. A total of 62.2% of subjects had access to a social alarm. Caregivers were more likely to answer that the device was not in use (23.6%) compared to patients (14%). Qualitative data revealed that approximately 50% of the patients were not aware of having such an alarm. Regression analyses assessed that access to a social alarm was associated with increasing age (86-97 years,  = 0.005) and living alone ( < 0.001). Compared to their caregivers, people with dementia were more likely to answer that the device gave them a false sense of security (28% vs. 9.9%), while caregivers were more likely to answer that the social alarm was of no value (31.4% vs.14.0%). The number of social alarms installed increased from 39.5% at baseline to 68% at 24 months. The frequency of unused social alarms increased from 12 months (17.7%) to 24 months (23.5%), and patients were less likely to feel safe during this period (60.8% vs. 70%).

Conclusion: Depending on their living situation, patients and family members experienced the installed social alarm differently. There is a gap between access to and the use of social alarms. The results indicate an urgent need for better routines in municipalities with regard to the provision and follow-up of existing social alarms. To meet the users' changing needs and abilities, passive monitoring may help them adapt to declining cognitive abilities and increase their safety.: https://ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04043364.

Citing Articles

Navigating care and communication: a qualitative study on nurses' perspectives in response centres.

Anker-Hansen C, Johansen E BMC Nurs. 2025; 24(1):170.

PMID: 39948604 PMC: 11827251. DOI: 10.1186/s12912-025-02811-9.


The organizational challenges of municipal call centers as a health service in Norway-a multiple case study.

Grondal-Eeles L, Dugstad J, Eide H, Nilsen E BMC Health Serv Res. 2025; 25(1):108.

PMID: 39833817 PMC: 11749625. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-025-12264-0.


Does assistive technology contribute to safety among home-dwelling older adults?.

Bikova M, Ambugo E, Tjerbo T, Jalovcic D, Forland O BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24(1):750.

PMID: 38898457 PMC: 11188293. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11185-8.

References
1.
Husebo B, Allore H, Achterberg W, Angeles R, Ballard C, Bruvik F . LIVE@Home.Path-innovating the clinical pathway for home-dwelling people with dementia and their caregivers: study protocol for a mixed-method, stepped-wedge, randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2020; 21(1):510. PMC: 7281688. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-04414-y. View

2.
Arevalo-Rodriguez I, Smailagic N, Roque I Figuls M, Ciapponi A, Sanchez-Perez E, Giannakou A . Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) for the detection of Alzheimer's disease and other dementias in people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; (3):CD010783. PMC: 6464748. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010783.pub2. View

3.
Barlow J, Singh D, Bayer S, Curry R . A systematic review of the benefits of home telecare for frail elderly people and those with long-term conditions. J Telemed Telecare. 2007; 13(4):172-9. DOI: 10.1258/135763307780908058. View

4.
Meiland F, Innes A, Mountain G, Robinson L, van der Roest H, Garcia-Casal J . Technologies to Support Community-Dwelling Persons With Dementia: A Position Paper on Issues Regarding Development, Usability, Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness, Deployment, and Ethics. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017; 4(1):e1. PMC: 5454557. DOI: 10.2196/rehab.6376. View

5.
Vollmer Dahlke D, Ory M . Emerging Issues of Intelligent Assistive Technology Use Among People With Dementia and Their Caregivers: A U.S. Perspective. Front Public Health. 2020; 8:191. PMC: 7254691. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00191. View