» Articles » PMID: 37271706

Immunogenicity and Safety of a Fourth Homologous Dose of NVX-CoV2373

Abstract

The emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants has significantly reduced the efficacy of some approved vaccines. A fourth dose of NVX-CoV2373 (5 µg SARS-CoV-2 recombinant spike [rS] protein + 50 µg Matrix-M™ adjuvant; Novavax, Gaithersburg, MD) was evaluated to determine induction of cross-reactive antibodies to variants of concern. A phase II randomized study (NCT04368988) recruited participants in Australia and the United States to assess a primary series of NVX-CoV2373 followed by two booster doses (third and fourth doses at 6-month intervals) in adults 18-84 years of age. The primary series was administered when the SARS-CoV-2 ancestral strain was prevalent and the third and fourth doses while the Alpha and Delta variants were prevalent in AUS and US. Local/systemic reactogenicity was assessed the day of vaccination and for 6 days thereafter. Unsolicited adverse events (AEs) were reported. Immunogenicity was measured before, and 14 days after, fourth dose administration, using anti-spike serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) and neutralization assays against ancestral SARS-CoV-2 strain and Omicron sublineages. Among 1283 enrolled participants, 258 were randomized to receive the two-dose primary series, of whom 104 received a third dose, and 45 received a fourth dose of NVX-CoV2373. The incidence of local/systemic reactogenicity events increased after the first three doses of NVX-CoV2373 and leveled off after dose 4. Unsolicited AEs were reported in 9 % of participants after dose 4 (none of which were severe or serious). Anti-rS IgG levels and neutralization antibody titers increased following booster doses to a level approximately four-fold higher than that observed after the primary series, with a progressively narrowed gap in response between the ancestral strain and Omicron BA.5. A fourth dose of NVX-CoV2373 enhanced immunogenicity for ancestral and variant SARS-CoV-2 strains without increasing reactogenicity, indicating that updates to the vaccine composition may not be currently warranted.

Citing Articles

Cost-Effectiveness of Introducing Nuvaxovid to COVID-19 Vaccination in the United Kingdom: A Dynamic Transmission Model.

Pritchard C, Kutikova L, Pitman R, Lai K, Beyhaghi H, Gibbons I Vaccines (Basel). 2025; 13(2).

PMID: 40006733 PMC: 11861217. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines13020187.


Current Updates on Variants of SARS-CoV- 2: Systematic Review.

Erkihun M, Ayele B, Asmare Z, Endalamaw K Health Sci Rep. 2024; 7(11):e70166.

PMID: 39502131 PMC: 11534727. DOI: 10.1002/hsr2.70166.


Cost-effectiveness analysis of NVX-CoV2373 COVID-19 vaccination for elderly people in Japan.

Kato M, Ono T, Deguchi H, Ohmagari N, Igarashi A Vaccine X. 2024; 19:100514.

PMID: 39108420 PMC: 11300936. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2024.100514.


Reactogenicity Differences between Adjuvanted, Protein-Based and Messenger Ribonucleic Acid (mRNA)-Based COVID-19 Vaccines.

Rousculp M, Hollis K, Ziemiecki R, Odom D, Marchese A, Montazeri M Vaccines (Basel). 2024; 12(7).

PMID: 39066440 PMC: 11281689. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines12070802.


Characteristics and Outcomes for Recipients of NVX-CoV2373: A Real-World Retrospective Study in Germany.

Kutikova L, Brash J, Helme K, Brewster J, Brand M, Adam A Vaccines (Basel). 2024; 12(4).

PMID: 38675769 PMC: 11054037. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines12040387.