Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis of Dental Diseases on Panoramic Radiographs: a Preliminary Study

Overview

Journal BMC Oral Health

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Dentistry

Date 2023 Jun 3

PMID 37270488

Authors

Junhua Zhu

Zhi Chen

Jing Zhao

Yueyuan Yu

Xiaojuan Li

Kangjian Shi

Fan Zhang

Feifei Yu

Keying Shi

Zhe Sun

Nengjie Lin

Yuanna Zheng

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) has been introduced to interpret the panoramic radiographs (PRs). The aim of this study was to develop an AI framework to diagnose multiple dental diseases on PRs, and to initially evaluate its performance.

Methods: The AI framework was developed based on 2 deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs), BDU-Net and nnU-Net. 1996 PRs were used for training. Diagnostic evaluation was performed on a separate evaluation dataset including 282 PRs. Sensitivity, specificity, Youden's index, the area under the curve (AUC), and diagnostic time were calculated. Dentists with 3 different levels of seniority (H: high, M: medium, L: low) diagnosed the same evaluation dataset independently. Mann-Whitney U test and Delong test were conducted for statistical analysis (ɑ=0.05).

Results: Sensitivity, specificity, and Youden's index of the framework for diagnosing 5 diseases were 0.964, 0.996, 0.960 (impacted teeth), 0.953, 0.998, 0.951 (full crowns), 0.871, 0.999, 0.870 (residual roots), 0.885, 0.994, 0.879 (missing teeth), and 0.554, 0.990, 0.544 (caries), respectively. AUC of the framework for the diseases were 0.980 (95%CI: 0.976-0.983, impacted teeth), 0.975 (95%CI: 0.972-0.978, full crowns), and 0.935 (95%CI: 0.929-0.940, residual roots), 0.939 (95%CI: 0.934-0.944, missing teeth), and 0.772 (95%CI: 0.764-0.781, caries), respectively. AUC of the AI framework was comparable to that of all dentists in diagnosing residual roots (p > 0.05), and its AUC values were similar to (p > 0.05) or better than (p < 0.05) that of M-level dentists for diagnosing 5 diseases. But AUC of the framework was statistically lower than some of H-level dentists for diagnosing impacted teeth, missing teeth, and caries (p < 0.05). The mean diagnostic time of the framework was significantly shorter than that of all dentists (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: The AI framework based on BDU-Net and nnU-Net demonstrated high specificity on diagnosing impacted teeth, full crowns, missing teeth, residual roots, and caries with high efficiency. The clinical feasibility of AI framework was preliminary verified since its performance was similar to or even better than the dentists with 3-10 years of experience. However, the AI framework for caries diagnosis should be improved.

Citing Articles

Evaluating ChatGPT-4's performance on oral and maxillofacial queries: Chain of Thought and standard method.

Ji K, Wu Z, Han J, Zhai G, Liu J Front Oral Health. 2025; 6:1541976.

PMID: 40013098 PMC: 11860867. DOI: 10.3389/froh.2025.1541976.

Automatic Segmentation of the Nasolacrimal Canal: Application of the nnU-Net v2 Model in CBCT Imaging.

Haylaz E, Gumussoy I, Duman S, Kalabalik F, Eren M, Demirsoy M J Clin Med. 2025; 14(3).

PMID: 39941449 PMC: 11818451. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14030778.

A novel deep learning-based pipeline architecture for pulp stone detection on panoramic radiographs.

Gurhan C, Yigit H, Yilmaz S, Cetinkaya C Oral Radiol. 2025; 41(2):285-295.

PMID: 39806222 DOI: 10.1007/s11282-025-00804-7.

Automating Dental Condition Detection on Panoramic Radiographs: Challenges, Pitfalls, and Opportunities.

Muresanu S, Hedesiu M, Iacob L, Eftimie R, Olariu E, Dinu C Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(20).

PMID: 39451659 PMC: 11507083. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14202336.

Multi-label dental disorder diagnosis based on MobileNetV2 and swin transformer using bagging ensemble classifier.

Alsakar Y, Elazab N, Nader N, Mohamed W, Ezzat M, Elmogy M Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):25193.

PMID: 39448640 PMC: 11502688. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-73297-9.

References

Keenan J, Keenan A . Accuracy of dental radiographs for caries detection. Evid Based Dent. 2016; 17(2):43. DOI: 10.1038/sj.ebd.6401166. View

Fourcade A, Khonsari R . Deep learning in medical image analysis: A third eye for doctors. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019; 120(4):279-288. DOI: 10.1016/j.jormas.2019.06.002. View

Nguyen T, Larrivee N, Lee A, Bilaniuk O, Durand R . Use of Artificial Intelligence in Dentistry: Current Clinical Trends and Research Advances. J Can Dent Assoc. 2021; 87:l7. View

Svenson B, Stahlnacke K, Karlsson R, Falt A . Dentists' use of digital radiographic techniques: Part I - intraoral X-ray: a questionnaire study of Swedish dentists. Acta Odontol Scand. 2017; 76(2):111-118. DOI: 10.1080/00016357.2017.1387930. View

Chen Y, Stanley K, Att W . Artificial intelligence in dentistry: current applications and future perspectives. Quintessence Int. 2020; 51(3):248-257. DOI: 10.3290/j.qi.a43952. View

Choi J . Assessment of panoramic radiography as a national oral examination tool: review of the literature. Imaging Sci Dent. 2011; 41(1):1-6. PMC: 3174459. DOI: 10.5624/isd.2011.41.1.1. View

Schwendicke F, Golla T, Dreher M, Krois J . Convolutional neural networks for dental image diagnostics: A scoping review. J Dent. 2019; 91:103226. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2019.103226. View

MacDonald D, Yu W . Incidental findings in a consecutive series of digital panoramic radiographs. Imaging Sci Dent. 2020; 50(1):53-64. PMC: 7078412. DOI: 10.5624/isd.2020.50.1.53. View

Terlemez A, Tassoker M, Kizilcakaya M, Gulec M . Comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and panoramic radiography in the evaluation of maxillary sinus pathology related to maxillary posterior teeth: Do apical lesions increase the risk of maxillary sinus pathology?. Imaging Sci Dent. 2019; 49(2):115-122. PMC: 6597370. DOI: 10.5624/isd.2019.49.2.115. View

10.

Lee J, Han S, Kim Y, Lee C, Kim I . Application of a fully deep convolutional neural network to the automation of tooth segmentation on panoramic radiographs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2020; 129(6):635-642. DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2019.11.007. View

11.

Tsuneki M . Deep learning models in medical image analysis. J Oral Biosci. 2022; 64(3):312-320. DOI: 10.1016/j.job.2022.03.003. View

12.

Tuzoff D, Tuzova L, Bornstein M, Krasnov A, Kharchenko M, Nikolenko S . Tooth detection and numbering in panoramic radiographs using convolutional neural networks. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2019; 48(4):20180051. PMC: 6592580. DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20180051. View

13.

Ishibashi K, Ariji Y, Kuwada C, Kimura M, Hashimoto K, Umemura M . Efficacy of a deep leaning model created with the transfer learning method in detecting sialoliths of the submandibular gland on panoramic radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2021; 133(2):238-244. DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2021.08.010. View

14.

De Araujo Faria V, Azimbagirad M, Arruda G, Fernandes Pavoni J, Felipe J, Dos Santos E . Prediction of Radiation-Related Dental Caries Through PyRadiomics Features and Artificial Neural Network on Panoramic Radiography. J Digit Imaging. 2021; 34(5):1237-1248. PMC: 8554996. DOI: 10.1007/s10278-021-00487-6. View

15.

Watanabe H, Ariji Y, Fukuda M, Kuwada C, Kise Y, Nozawa M . Deep learning object detection of maxillary cyst-like lesions on panoramic radiographs: preliminary study. Oral Radiol. 2020; 37(3):487-493. DOI: 10.1007/s11282-020-00485-4. View

16.

Aliaga I, Vera V, Vera M, Garcia E, Pedrera M, Pajares G . Automatic computation of mandibular indices in dental panoramic radiographs for early osteoporosis detection. Artif Intell Med. 2020; 103:101816. DOI: 10.1016/j.artmed.2020.101816. View

17.

Warin K, Limprasert W, Suebnukarn S, Inglam S, Jantana P, Vicharueang S . Assessment of deep convolutional neural network models for mandibular fracture detection in panoramic radiographs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2022; 51(11):1488-1494. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2022.03.056. View

18.

Farman A . There are good reasons for selecting panoramic radiography to replace the intraoral full-mouth series. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2003; 94(6):653-4; author reply 654-5. DOI: 10.1067/moe.2002.129766. View

19.

Bekiroglu N, Mete S, Ozbay G, Yalcinkaya S, Kargul B . Evaluation of panoramic radiographs taken from 1,056 Turkish children. Niger J Clin Pract. 2014; 18(1):8-12. DOI: 10.4103/1119-3077.146965. View

20.

Vinayahalingam S, Goey R, Kempers S, Schoep J, Cherici T, Moin D . Automated chart filing on panoramic radiographs using deep learning. J Dent. 2021; 115:103864. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103864. View