» Articles » PMID: 38731237

Periapical Lesions in Panoramic Radiography and CBCT Imaging-Assessment of AI's Diagnostic Accuracy

Overview
Journal J Clin Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2024 May 11
PMID 38731237
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

: Periapical lesions (PLs) are frequently detected in dental radiology. Accurate diagnosis of these lesions is essential for proper treatment planning. Imaging techniques such as orthopantomogram (OPG) and cone-beam CT (CBCT) imaging are used to identify PLs. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI) software Diagnocat for PL detection in OPG and CBCT images. : The study included 49 patients, totaling 1223 teeth. Both OPG and CBCT images were analyzed by AI software and by three experienced clinicians. All the images were obtained in one patient cohort, and findings were compared to the consensus of human readers using CBCT. The AI's diagnostic accuracy was compared to a reference method, calculating sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and F1 score. : The AI's sensitivity for OPG images was 33.33% with an F1 score of 32.73%. For CBCT images, the AI's sensitivity was 77.78% with an F1 score of 84.00%. The AI's specificity was over 98% for both OPG and CBCT images. : The AI demonstrated high sensitivity and high specificity in detecting PLs in CBCT images but lower sensitivity in OPG images.

Citing Articles

Automated Age Estimation from OPG Images and Patient Records Using Deep Feature Extraction and Modified Genetic-Random Forest.

Ozlu Ucan G, Gwassi O, Apaydin B, Ucan B Diagnostics (Basel). 2025; 15(3).

PMID: 39941244 PMC: 11817095. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics15030314.


Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Segmentation of a Falx Cerebri Calcification on Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: A Case Report.

Issa J, Chidiac A, Mozdziak P, Kempisty B, Dorocka-Bobkowska B, Mehr K Medicina (Kaunas). 2025; 60(12.

PMID: 39768927 PMC: 11676691. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60122048.


Evaluation of Dental Panoramic Radiographs by Artificial Intelligence Compared to Human Reference: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study.

Turosz N, Checinska K, Checinski M, Sielski M, Sikora M J Clin Med. 2024; 13(22).

PMID: 39598002 PMC: 11595016. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13226859.


Automating Dental Condition Detection on Panoramic Radiographs: Challenges, Pitfalls, and Opportunities.

Muresanu S, Hedesiu M, Iacob L, Eftimie R, Olariu E, Dinu C Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(20).

PMID: 39451659 PMC: 11507083. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14202336.


Assessment of Periodontitis Risk Factors in Endodontically Treated Teeth: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Salceanu M, Dascalu C, Melian A, Giuroiu C, Antohi C, Concita C Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(17).

PMID: 39272756 PMC: 11394269. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14171972.


References
1.
Endres M, Hillen F, Salloumis M, Sedaghat A, Niehues S, Quatela O . Development of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Periapical Disease Detection in Dental Radiographs. Diagnostics (Basel). 2020; 10(6). PMC: 7344682. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics10060430. View

2.
Badr F, Jadu F . Performance of artificial intelligence using oral and maxillofacial CBCT images: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Niger J Clin Pract. 2022; 25(11):1918-1927. DOI: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_394_22. View

3.
Barnett C, Glickman G, Umorin M, Jalali P . Interobserver and Intraobserver Reliability of Cone-beam Computed Tomography in Identification of Apical Periodontitis. J Endod. 2018; 44(6):938-940. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.12.022. View

4.
Heo M, Kim J, Hwang J, Han S, Kim J, Yi W . Artificial intelligence in oral and maxillofacial radiology: what is currently possible?. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2020; 50(3):20200375. PMC: 7923066. DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20200375. View

5.
Lee J, Han S, Kim Y, Lee C, Kim I . Application of a fully deep convolutional neural network to the automation of tooth segmentation on panoramic radiographs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2020; 129(6):635-642. DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2019.11.007. View