» Articles » PMID: 37266443

Diagnostic Model Constructed by Five EMT-related Genes for Renal Fibrosis and Reflecting the Condition of Immune-related Cells

Overview
Journal Front Immunol
Date 2023 Jun 2
PMID 37266443
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Renal fibrosis is a physiological and pathological characteristic of chronic kidney disease (CKD) to end-stage renal disease. Since renal biopsy is the gold standard for evaluating renal fibrosis, there is an urgent need for additional non-invasive diagnostic biomarkers.

Methods: We used R package "limma" to screen out differently expressed genes (DEGs) based on Epithelial-mesenchymal transformation (EMT), and carried out the protein interaction network and GO, KEGG enrichment analysis of DEGs. Secondly, the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), random forest tree (RF), and support vector machine-recursive feature elimination (SVM-RFE) algorithms were used to identify candidate diagnostic genes. ROC curves were plotted to evaluate the clinical diagnostic value of these genes. In addition, mRNA expression levels of candidate diagnostic genes were analyzed in control samples and renal fibrosis samples. CIBERSORT algorithm was used to evaluate immune cells level. Additionally, gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) and drug sensitivity were conducted.

Results: After obtaining a total of 24 DEGs, we discovered that they were mostly involved in several immunological and inflammatory pathways, including NF-KappaB signaling, AGE-RAGE signaling, and TNF signaling. Five genes (COL4A2, CXCL1, TIMP1, VCAM1, and VEGFA) were subsequently identified as biomarkers for renal fibrosis through machine learning, and their expression levels were confirmed by validation cohort data sets and RT-qPCR experiment. The AUC values of these five genes demonstrated significant clinical diagnostic value in both the training and validation sets. After that, CIBERSORT analysis showed that these biomarkers were strongly associated with immune cell content in renal fibrosis patients. GSEA also identifies the potential roles of these diagnostic genes. Additionally, diagnostic candidate genes were found to be closely related to drug sensitivity. Finally, a nomogram for diagnosing renal fibrosis was developed.

Conclusion: COL4A2, CXCL1, TIMP1, VCAM1, and VEGFA are promising diagnostic biomarkers of tissue and serum for renal fibrosis.

Citing Articles

Identification of biomarkers for chronic renal fibrosis and their relationship with immune infiltration and cell death.

Shi J, Qin X, Sha H, Wang R, Shen H, Chen Y Ren Fail. 2025; 47(1):2449195.

PMID: 39780495 PMC: 11721624. DOI: 10.1080/0886022X.2024.2449195.


Diagnostic Value of Plasma Long Non-coding SLC26A4 Antisense RNA 1 Combined with Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Rectal Cancer.

Li Z, Pu M, Zhou P, Zhang T, Xu Y, Zhang Y Turk J Gastroenterol. 2024; 35(12):900-908.

PMID: 39641247 PMC: 11639608. DOI: 10.5152/tjg.2024.23558.

References
1.
Feng S, Huang N, Xue M, Zhang P, Zhong Z, Guo Q . Association between urinary VEGFA and renal pathology of IgA nephropathy patients. J Clin Lab Anal. 2021; :e23995. PMC: 8551689. DOI: 10.1002/jcla.23995. View

2.
Srivastava A, Tomar B, Prajapati S, Gaikwad A, Mulay S . Advanced non-invasive diagnostic techniques for visualization and estimation of kidney fibrosis. Drug Discov Today. 2021; 26(8):2053-2063. DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2021.02.016. View

3.
Koszegi S, Molnar A, Lenart L, Hodrea J, Balogh D, Lakat T . RAAS inhibitors directly reduce diabetes-induced renal fibrosis via growth factor inhibition. J Physiol. 2018; 597(1):193-209. PMC: 6312411. DOI: 10.1113/JP277002. View

4.
Wang Y, Chen H, Lo S, Chen Y, Huang Y, Hu S . Visfatin Enhances Breast Cancer Progression through CXCL1 Induction in Tumor-Associated Macrophages. Cancers (Basel). 2020; 12(12). PMC: 7760195. DOI: 10.3390/cancers12123526. View

5.
Zhou Y, Yang X, Liu H, Luo W, Liu H, Lv T . Value of [Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 imaging in the diagnosis of renal fibrosis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021; 48(11):3493-3501. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-021-05343-x. View