» Articles » PMID: 37258558

Face Masks Influence Emotion Judgments of Facial Expressions: a Drift-diffusion Model

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2023 May 31
PMID 37258558
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Face masks slow the spread of SARS-CoV-2, but it has been unknown how masks might reshape social interaction. One important possibility is that masks may influence how individuals communicate emotion through facial expressions. Here, we clarify to what extent-and how-masks influence facial emotion communication, through drift-diffusion modeling (DDM). Over two independent pre-registered studies, conducted three and 6 months into the COVID-19 pandemic, online participants judged expressions of 6 emotions (anger, disgust, fear, happiness, sadness, surprise) with the lower or upper face "masked" or unmasked. Participants in Study 1 (N = 228) correctly identified expressions above chance with lower face masks. However, they were less likely-and slower-to correctly identify these expressions relative to without masks, and they accumulated evidence for emotion more slowly-via decreased drift rate in DDM. This pattern replicated and intensified 3 months later in Study 2 (N = 264). These findings highlight how effectively individuals still communicate with masks, but also explain why they can experience difficulties communicating when masked. By revealing evidence accumulation as the underlying mechanism, this work suggests that time-sensitive situations may risk miscommunication with masks. This research could inform critical interventions to promote continued mask wearing as needed.

Citing Articles

Effects of Distance, Noise, and Personal Respiratory Protective Equipment on Speech Comprehension in Simulated Critical Care Setting.

Rojo-Rojo A, Martinez-Abril J, Munoz-Rubio G, Iniesta-Cortes P, Canovas-Pallares J Healthcare (Basel). 2025; 13(4).

PMID: 39997273 PMC: 11855685. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare13040398.


Effect of Surgical Masks and N95 Respirators on Anxiety.

Zhang Y, Yang Q, Ma Q, Wu Y, Wang Y, Chen C Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2024; 20:551-559.

PMID: 38482023 PMC: 10933521. DOI: 10.2147/NDT.S447428.


Effects of face masks on fairness in on-site personnel selection during a pandemic.

Zinn F, Mittelstadt J Front Psychol. 2023; 14:1168311.

PMID: 37720631 PMC: 10500303. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1168311.


Influence of child and adult faces with face masks on emotion perception and facial mimicry.

Kastendieck T, Dippel N, Asbrand J, Hess U Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):14848.

PMID: 37684246 PMC: 10491609. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-40007-w.


Lay theories about emotion recognition explain cultural differences in willingness to wear facial masks during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Nayani F, Yuki M, Maddux W, Schug J Curr Res Ecol Soc Psychol. 2023; 4:100089.

PMID: 36685995 PMC: 9839383. DOI: 10.1016/j.cresp.2023.100089.


References
1.
Gori M, Schiatti L, Amadeo M . Masking Emotions: Face Masks Impair How We Read Emotions. Front Psychol. 2021; 12:669432. PMC: 8185341. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.669432. View

2.
Van Bavel J, Baicker K, Boggio P, Capraro V, Cichocka A, Cikara M . Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. Nat Hum Behav. 2020; 4(5):460-471. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-020-0884-z. View

3.
Nusseck M, Cunningham D, Wallraven C, Bulthoff H . The contribution of different facial regions to the recognition of conversational expressions. J Vis. 2008; 8(8):1.1-23. DOI: 10.1167/8.8.1. View

4.
Marini M, Ansani A, Paglieri F, Caruana F, Viola M . The impact of facemasks on emotion recognition, trust attribution and re-identification. Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):5577. PMC: 7970937. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-84806-5. View

5.
Schurgin M, Nelson J, Iida S, Ohira H, Chiao J, Franconeri S . Eye movements during emotion recognition in faces. J Vis. 2014; 14(13):14. DOI: 10.1167/14.13.14. View