An Ecological Analysis of Walkability and Housing Affordability in Canada: Moderation by City Size and Neighbourhood Property Type Composition

Overview

Journal PLoS One

Specialties General Medicine
Science

Date 2023 May 31

PMID 37256893

Authors

Chelsea D Christie

Christine M Friedenreich

Jennifer E Vena

Dany Doiron

Gavin R McCormack

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The neighbourhood built environment can support the physical activity of adults regardless of their individual-level socioeconomic status. However, physical activity supportive (walkable) neighbourhoods may not be accessible to those with lower incomes if homes in walkable neighbourhoods are too expensive. The objectives of this study were: 1) to estimate the associations between neighbourhood walkability and home values in Canadian cities, and 2) to test whether these associations differ by city size and residential property type composition within neighbourhoods. We linked built environment data from the 2016 Canadian Active Living Environments (Can-ALE) index with neighbourhood-level structural home characteristics and sociodemographic data from the 2016 Canadian census for 33,026 neighbourhoods across 31 Census Metropolitan Areas. We used multilevel linear regression models to estimate covariate-adjusted associations between neighbourhood walkability and natural-log median home values and tested city size and neighbourhood property type composition as moderators. There were no statistically significant associations between walkability and home values overall. The associations between neighbourhood walkability and home values were jointly moderated by city size and property type composition. For small and medium sized cities, within neighbourhoods containing a high proportion of detached homes, walkability was negatively associated with home values (b = -0.05, 95% CI: -0.10, -0.01; and, b = -0.04, 95% CI: -0.06, -0.02, for small and medium cities, respectively). However, for extra-large cities, within neighbourhoods containing a high proportion of detached homes, walkability was positively associated with home values (b = 0.06, 95% CI: 0.01, 0.10). Our findings suggest that, based on housing affordability, higher walkable neighbourhoods are likely accessible to lower income households that are situated in small and medium Canadian cities. In larger cities, however, municipal interventions (e.g., inclusionary zoning or targeted development of subsidized or social housing) may be needed to ensure equitable access to walkable neighbourhoods for lower income households.

References

Winters M, BARNES R, Venners S, Ste-Marie N, McKay H, Sims-Gould J . Older adults' outdoor walking and the built environment: does income matter?. BMC Public Health. 2015; 15:876. PMC: 4566863. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-015-2224-1. View

Smith M, Hosking J, Woodward A, Witten K, Macmillan A, Field A . Systematic literature review of built environment effects on physical activity and active transport - an update and new findings on health equity. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017; 14(1):158. PMC: 5693449. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-017-0613-9. View

Frank L, Kershaw S, Chapman J, Campbell M, Swinkels H . The unmet demand for walkability: Disparities between preferences and actual choices for residential environments in Toronto and Vancouver. Can J Public Health. 2015; 106(1 Suppl 1):eS12-21. PMC: 6972097. DOI: 10.17269/cjph.106.4397. View

Hermann T, Gleckner W, Wasfi R, Thierry B, Kestens Y, Ross N . A pan-Canadian measure of active living environments using open data. Health Rep. 2019; 30(5):16-25. DOI: 10.25318/82-003-x201900500002-eng. View

Brook J, Setton E, Seed E, Shooshtari M, Doiron D . The Canadian Urban Environmental Health Research Consortium - a protocol for building a national environmental exposure data platform for integrated analyses of urban form and health. BMC Public Health. 2018; 18(1):114. PMC: 5759244. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-017-5001-5. View

de Sa E, Ardern C . Associations between the built environment, total, recreational, and transit-related physical activity. BMC Public Health. 2014; 14:693. PMC: 4107974. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-693. View

Christie C, Consoli A, Ronksley P, Vena J, Friedenreich C, McCormack G . Associations between the built environment and physical activity among adults with low socio-economic status in Canada: a systematic review. Can J Public Health. 2020; 112(1):152-165. PMC: 7851286. DOI: 10.17269/s41997-020-00364-9. View

Doiron D, Setton E, Shairsingh K, Brauer M, Hystad P, Ross N . Healthy built environment: Spatial patterns and relationships of multiple exposures and deprivation in Toronto, Montreal and Vancouver. Environ Int. 2020; 143:106003. DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.106003. View

McCormack G, Shiell A, Doyle-Baker P, Friedenreich C, Sandalack B . Subpopulation differences in the association between neighborhood urban form and neighborhood-based physical activity. Health Place. 2014; 28:109-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2014.04.001. View

10.

Giles-Corti B, Timperio A, Bull F, Pikora T . Understanding physical activity environmental correlates: increased specificity for ecological models. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2005; 33(4):175-81. DOI: 10.1097/00003677-200510000-00005. View

11.

Sallis J, Cervero R, Ascher W, Henderson K, Kraft M, Kerr J . An ecological approach to creating active living communities. Annu Rev Public Health. 2006; 27:297-322. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.27.021405.102100. View

12.

Ding D, Gebel K . Built environment, physical activity, and obesity: what have we learned from reviewing the literature?. Health Place. 2011; 18(1):100-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.08.021. View

13.

Lee I, Buchner D . The importance of walking to public health. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008; 40(7 Suppl):S512-8. DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31817c65d0. View

14.

Barnett D, Barnett A, Nathan A, Van Cauwenberg J, Cerin E . Built environmental correlates of older adults' total physical activity and walking: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017; 14(1):103. PMC: 5547528. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-017-0558-z. View

15.

Siegel P, Brackbill R, Heath G . The epidemiology of walking for exercise: implications for promoting activity among sedentary groups. Am J Public Health. 1995; 85(5):706-10. PMC: 1615430. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.85.5.706. View

16.

Wood L, Shannon T, Bulsara M, Pikora T, McCormack G, Giles-Corti B . The anatomy of the safe and social suburb: an exploratory study of the built environment, social capital and residents' perceptions of safety. Health Place. 2007; 14(1):15-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2007.04.004. View

17.

Hajna S, Ross N, Joseph L, Harper S, Dasgupta K . Neighbourhood walkability, daily steps and utilitarian walking in Canadian adults. BMJ Open. 2015; 5(11):e008964. PMC: 4679838. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008964. View

18.

Hajna S, Ross N, Brazeau A, Belisle P, Joseph L, Dasgupta K . Associations between neighbourhood walkability and daily steps in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2015; 15:768. PMC: 4532296. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-015-2082-x. View

19.

Colley R, Christidis T, Michaud I, Tjepkema M, Ross N . The association between walkable neighbourhoods and physical activity across the lifespan. Health Rep. 2019; 30(9):3-13. DOI: 10.25318/82-003-x201900900001-eng. View

20.

Kelly P, Kahlmeier S, Gotschi T, Orsini N, Richards J, Roberts N . Systematic review and meta-analysis of reduction in all-cause mortality from walking and cycling and shape of dose response relationship. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014; 11:132. PMC: 4262114. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-014-0132-x. View