Neighbourhood Walkability, Daily Steps and Utilitarian Walking in Canadian Adults

Overview

Journal BMJ Open

Specialty General Medicine

Date 2015 Nov 26

PMID 26603246

Citations 31

Authors

Samantha Hajna

Nancy A Ross

Lawrence Joseph

Sam Harper

Kaberi Dasgupta

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objectives: To estimate the associations of neighbourhood walkability (based on Geographic Information System (GIS)-derived measures of street connectivity, land use mix, and population density and the Walk Score) with self-reported utilitarian walking and accelerometer-assessed daily steps in Canadian adults.

Design: A cross-sectional analysis of data collected as part of the Canadian Health Measures Survey (2007-2009).

Setting: Home neighbourhoods (500 m polygonal street network buffers around the centroid of the participant's postal code) located in Atlantic Canada, Québec, Ontario, the Prairies and British Columbia.

Participants: 5605 individuals participated in the survey. 3727 adults (≥18 years) completed a computer-assisted interview and attended a mobile clinic assessment. Analyses were based on those who had complete exposure, outcome and covariate data (n=2949).

Main Exposure Measures: GIS-derived walkability (based on land use mix, street connectivity and population density); Walk Score.

Main Outcome Measures: Self-reported utilitarian walking; accelerometer-assessed daily steps.

Results: No important relationship was observed between neighbourhood walkability and daily steps. Participants who reported more utilitarian walking, however, accumulated more steps (<1 h/week: 6613 steps/day, 95% CI 6251 to 6975; 1 to 5 h/week: 6768 steps/day, 95% CI 6420 to 7117; ≥6 h/week: 7391 steps/day, 95% CI 6972 to 7811). There was a positive graded association between walkability and odds of walking ≥1 h/week for utilitarian purposes (eg, Q4 vs Q1 of GIS-derived walkability: OR=1.66, 95% CI 1.31 to 2.11; Q3 vs Q1: OR=1.41, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.76; Q2 vs Q1: OR=1.13, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.39) independent of age, sex, body mass index, married/common law status, annual household income, having children in the household, immigrant status, mood disorder, perceived health, ever smoker and season.

Conclusions: Contrary to expectations, living in more walkable Canadian neighbourhoods was not associated with more total walking. Utilitarian walking and daily steps were, however, correlated and walkability demonstrated a positive graded relationship with utilitarian walking.

Citing Articles

Neighbourhood walkability and transportation and leisure physical activity by residency status: A cross-sectional analysis of nationally representative Canadian data.

Masihay Akbar H, Turin T, Olstad D, McCormack G J Migr Health. 2024; 10:100285.

PMID: 39649072 PMC: 11625336. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmh.2024.100285.

Individual and environmental variables related to outdoor walking among older adults: Verifying a model to guide the design of interventions targeting outdoor walking.

Liu Y, Salbach N, Webber S, Barclay R PLoS One. 2024; 19(1):e0296216.

PMID: 38198462 PMC: 10781134. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296216.

The Association between Neighborhood Walkability and Physical Activity in a Behavioral Weight Loss Trial Testing the Addition of Remotely Delivered Feedback Messages to Self-Monitoring.

Kariuki J, Bizhanova Z, Conroy M, Burke L, Cheng J, Beatrice B Behav Med. 2023; 50(3):232-241.

PMID: 37489802 PMC: 10808266. DOI: 10.1080/08964289.2023.2238102.

An ecological analysis of walkability and housing affordability in Canada: Moderation by city size and neighbourhood property type composition.

Christie C, Friedenreich C, Vena J, Doiron D, McCormack G PLoS One. 2023; 18(5):e0285397.

PMID: 37256893 PMC: 10231822. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285397.

The effect of neighborhood walkability on changes in physical activity and sedentary behavior during a 12-week pedometer-facilitated intervention.

McCormack G, Spence J, McHugh T, Mummery W PLoS One. 2022; 17(12):e0278596.

PMID: 36455004 PMC: 9714904. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278596.

References

Garriguet D, Tremblay S, Colley R . Comparison of Physical Activity Adult Questionnaire results with accelerometer data. Health Rep. 2015; 26(7):11-7. View

Hajna S, Dasgupta K, Joseph L, Ross N . A call for caution and transparency in the calculation of land use mix: measurement bias in the estimation of associations between land use mix and physical activity. Health Place. 2014; 29:79-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2014.06.002. View

Van Holle V, Van Cauwenberg J, Van Dyck D, Deforche B, Van de Weghe N, De Bourdeaudhuij I . Relationship between neighborhood walkability and older adults' physical activity: results from the Belgian Environmental Physical Activity Study in Seniors (BEPAS Seniors). Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014; 11:110. PMC: 4145228. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-014-0110-3. View

Gilmour H . Physically active Canadians. Health Rep. 2007; 18(3):45-65. View

Doescher M, Lee C, Berke E, Adachi-Mejia A, Lee C, Stewart O . The built environment and utilitarian walking in small U.S. towns. Prev Med. 2014; 69:80-6. PMC: 4312190. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.08.027. View

French S, Story M, Jeffery R . Environmental influences on eating and physical activity. Annu Rev Public Health. 2001; 22:309-35. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.22.1.309. View

Frank L, Saelens B, Powell K, Chapman J . Stepping towards causation: do built environments or neighborhood and travel preferences explain physical activity, driving, and obesity?. Soc Sci Med. 2007; 65(9):1898-914. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.05.053. View

Hajna S, Ross N, Brazeau A, Belisle P, Joseph L, Dasgupta K . Associations between neighbourhood walkability and daily steps in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2015; 15:768. PMC: 4532296. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-015-2082-x. View

Riley D, Mark A, Kristjansson E, Sawada M, Reid R . Neighbourhood walkability and physical activity among family members of people with heart disease who participated in a randomized controlled trial of a behavioural risk reduction intervention. Health Place. 2013; 21:148-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2013.01.010. View

10.

Oakes J, Forsyth A, Schmitz K . The effects of neighborhood density and street connectivity on walking behavior: the Twin Cities walking study. Epidemiol Perspect Innov. 2007; 4:16. PMC: 2228289. DOI: 10.1186/1742-5573-4-16. View

11.

Van Dyck D, Cardon G, Deforche B, De Bourdeaudhuij I . Urban-rural differences in physical activity in Belgian adults and the importance of psychosocial factors. J Urban Health. 2011; 88(1):154-67. PMC: 3042086. DOI: 10.1007/s11524-010-9536-3. View

12.

Saelens B, Sallis J, Frank L . Environmental correlates of walking and cycling: findings from the transportation, urban design, and planning literatures. Ann Behav Med. 2003; 25(2):80-91. DOI: 10.1207/S15324796ABM2502_03. View

13.

Carr L, Dunsiger S, Marcus B . Validation of Walk Score for estimating access to walkable amenities. Br J Sports Med. 2010; 45(14):1144-8. PMC: 4845899. DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.2009.069609. View

14.

Frank L, Schmid T, Sallis J, Chapman J, Saelens B . Linking objectively measured physical activity with objectively measured urban form: findings from SMARTRAQ. Am J Prev Med. 2005; 28(2 Suppl 2):117-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.11.001. View

15.

Christian H, Bull F, Middleton N, Knuiman M, Divitini M, Hooper P . How important is the land use mix measure in understanding walking behaviour? Results from the RESIDE study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011; 8:55. PMC: 3142478. DOI: 10.1186/1479-5868-8-55. View

16.

Kondo K, Lee J, Kawakubo K, Kataoka Y, Asami Y, Mori K . Association between daily physical activity and neighborhood environments. Environ Health Prev Med. 2009; 14(3):196-206. PMC: 2684800. DOI: 10.1007/s12199-009-0081-1. View

17.

Oliver L, Schuurman N, Hall A . Comparing circular and network buffers to examine the influence of land use on walking for leisure and errands. Int J Health Geogr. 2007; 6:41. PMC: 2034381. DOI: 10.1186/1476-072X-6-41. View

18.

Ding D, Sallis J, Norman G, Frank L, Saelens B, Kerr J . Neighborhood environment and physical activity among older adults: do the relationships differ by driving status?. J Aging Phys Act. 2013; 22(3):421-31. PMC: 4653066. DOI: 10.1123/japa.2012-0332. View

19.

Esliger D, Probert A, Connor Gorber S, Bryan S, Laviolette M, Tremblay M . Validity of the Actical accelerometer step-count function. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007; 39(7):1200-4. DOI: 10.1249/mss.0b013e3804ec4e9. View

20.

Boone-Heinonen J, Gordon-Larsen P, Guilkey D, Jacobs Jr D, Popkin B . Environment and Physical Activity Dynamics: The Role of Residential Self-selection. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2011; 12(1):54-60. PMC: 3079234. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychsport.2009.09.003. View