» Articles » PMID: 37256670

Characteristics and Emerging Trends in Research on Rehabilitation Robots from 2001 to 2020: Bibliometric Study

Overview
Publisher JMIR Publications
Date 2023 May 31
PMID 37256670
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The past 2 decades have seen rapid development in the use of robots for rehabilitation. Research on rehabilitation robots involves interdisciplinary activities, making it a great challenge to obtain comprehensive insights in this research field.

Objective: We performed a bibliometric study to understand the characteristics of research on rehabilitation robots and emerging trends in this field in the last 2 decades.

Methods: Reports on the topic of rehabilitation robots published from January 1, 2001, to December 31, 2020, were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection on July 28, 2022. Document types were limited to "article" and "meeting" (excluding the "review" type), to ensure that our analysis of the evolution over time of this research had high validity. We used CiteSpace to conduct a co-occurrence and co-citation analysis and to visualize the characteristics of this research field and emerging trends. Landmark publications were identified using metrics such as betweenness centrality and burst strength.

Results: Through data retrieval, cleaning, and deduplication, we retrieved 9287 publications and 110,619 references cited in these publications that were on the topic of rehabilitation robots and were published between 2001 and 2020. Results of the Mann-Kendall test indicated that the numbers of both publications (P<.001; S=175.0) and citations (P<.001; S=188.0) related to rehabilitation robots exhibited a significantly increasing yearly trend. The co-occurrence results revealed 120 categories connected with research on rehabilitation robots; we used these categories to determine research relationships. The co-citation results identified 169 co-citation clusters characterizing this research field and emerging trends in it. The most prominent label was "soft robotic technology" (the burst strength was 79.07), which has become a topic of great interest in rehabilitative recovery for both the upper and lower limbs. Additionally, task-oriented upper-limb training, control strategies for robot-assisted lower limb rehabilitation, and power in exoskeleton robots were topics of great interest in current research.

Conclusions: Our work provides insights into research on rehabilitation robots, including its characteristics and emerging trends during the last 2 decades, providing a comprehensive understanding of this research field.

Citing Articles

Global Research Hotspots and Trends in Advances of the Ilizarov Technique: A Bibliometric Mapping.

Wang X, Lu F, Wang W, Zhi X Orthop Surg. 2025; 17(3):663-676.

PMID: 39887641 PMC: 11872365. DOI: 10.1111/os.14325.


Upper limb exoskeleton rehabilitation robot inverse kinematics modeling and solution method based on multi-objective optimization.

Ning Y, Sang L, Wang H, Wang Q, Vladareanu L, Niu J Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):25476.

PMID: 39462117 PMC: 11513120. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-77137-8.


Implanted cortical neuroprosthetics for speech and movement restoration.

Muirhead W, Layard Horsfall H, Aicardi C, Carolan J, Akram H, Vanhoestenberghe A J Neurol. 2024; 271(11):7156-7168.

PMID: 39446156 PMC: 11561076. DOI: 10.1007/s00415-024-12604-w.


A correspondence of evaluation of deep learning algorithms in detecting Moyamoya disease: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis.

Li X, Chen S, Chen S, Qiu G Neurosurg Rev. 2024; 47(1):450.

PMID: 39167278 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-024-02701-9.


Cardiovascular Comorbidities in COVID-19: Comprehensive Analysis of Key Topics.

Markovic R, Ternar L, Trstenjak T, Marhl M, Grubelnik V Interact J Med Res. 2024; 13:e55699.

PMID: 39046774 PMC: 11306943. DOI: 10.2196/55699.


References
1.
Fasoli S, Krebs H, Stein J, Frontera W, Hogan N . Effects of robotic therapy on motor impairment and recovery in chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003; 84(4):477-82. DOI: 10.1053/apmr.2003.50110. View

2.
Ferraro M, Palazzolo J, Krol J, Krebs H, Hogan N, Volpe B . Robot-aided sensorimotor arm training improves outcome in patients with chronic stroke. Neurology. 2003; 61(11):1604-7. DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000095963.00970.68. View

3.
Chiang M, Lin H, Hou C . Development of a stereo vision measurement system for a 3D three-axial pneumatic parallel mechanism robot arm. Sensors (Basel). 2012; 11(2):2257-81. PMC: 3274037. DOI: 10.3390/s110202257. View

4.
Ang K, Chua K, Phua K, Wang C, Chin Z, Kuah C . A Randomized Controlled Trial of EEG-Based Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interface Robotic Rehabilitation for Stroke. Clin EEG Neurosci. 2014; 46(4):310-20. DOI: 10.1177/1550059414522229. View

5.
Falagas M, Pitsouni E, Malietzis G, Pappas G . Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar: strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J. 2007; 22(2):338-42. DOI: 10.1096/fj.07-9492LSF. View