» Articles » PMID: 37254849

Real Patient Participation in Workplace-Based Assessment of Health Professional Trainees: A Scoping Review

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Specialty Health Services
Date 2023 May 31
PMID 37254849
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of this scoping review is to outline the existing landscape of how real patients participate in the workplace-based assessment of trainees across diverse healthcare professions. In 2019-2020, the authors searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, ERIC, and Web of Science databases for studies that included descriptions of experiences whereby patients received care from a health professional trainee and participated in workplace-based assessments of that trainee. Full-text articles published in English from 2009 to 2020 were included in the search. Of the 8770 studies screened; 77 full-text articles were included. Analysis showed that strategies for patient participation in workplace-based assessment varied widely. Aspects studied ranged from validation of an assessment tool to evaluation of the impact of an educational intervention on trainees' performance. Assessment of patient satisfaction was the most common approach to patient involvement. The majority of studies were conducted in North America and in the context of physician training. Formal patient participation in the assessment of health professional trainees appears heterogeneous across health professions. Gaps in the literature are evident; therefore, this review points to an inclusive approach to workplace-based assessment to ensure patient feedback of the trainees who care for them is represented.

References
1.
Davies C, Lunn K . The patient's role in the assessment of students' communication skills. Nurse Educ Today. 2008; 29(4):405-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2008.08.018. View

2.
Francis M, Warm E, Julian K, Rosenblum M, Thomas K, Drake S . Determinants of Patient Satisfaction in Internal Medicine Resident Continuity Clinics: Findings of the Educational Innovations Project Ambulatory Collaborative. J Grad Med Educ. 2015; 6(3):470-7. PMC: 4535210. DOI: 10.4300/JGME-D-13-00398.1. View

3.
Pham M, Rajic A, Greig J, Sargeant J, Papadopoulos A, McEwen S . A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency. Res Synth Methods. 2015; 5(4):371-85. PMC: 4491356. DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1123. View

4.
McElroy K, Cuccurullo S, Perret-Karimi D, Hata J, Ferrer S, Demesmin D . Interventional pain management skills competency in pain medicine fellows: a method for development and assessment. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2014; 93(8):724-31. DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000142. View

5.
Miguel Santiago L, Neto I . SOAP Methodology in General Practice/Family Medicine Teaching in Practical Context. Acta Med Port. 2017; 29(12):854-859. DOI: 10.20344/amp.8405. View