» Articles » PMID: 37242635

Model-Based Analysis of In Vivo Release Data of Levonorgestrel Implants: Projecting Long-Term Systemic Exposure

Overview
Journal Pharmaceutics
Publisher MDPI
Date 2023 May 27
PMID 37242635
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Levonorgestrel (LNG) is a progestin used in many contraceptive formulations, including subcutaneous implants. There is an unmet need for developing long-acting formulations for LNG. To develop long-acting formulations, release functions need to be investigated for LNG implant. Therefore, a release model was developed and integrated into an LNG physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model. Utilizing a previously developed LNG PBPK model, subcutaneous administration of 150 mg LNG was implemented into the modeling framework. To mimic LNG release, ten functions incorporating formulation-specific mechanisms were explored. Release kinetic parameters and bioavailability were optimized using Jadelle clinical trial data (n = 321) and verified using two additional clinical trials (n = 216). The First-order release and Biexponential release models showed the best fit with observed data, the adjusted R-squared (R) value is 0.9170. The maximum released amount is approximately 50% of the loaded dose and the release rate is 0.0009 per day. The Biexponential model also showed good agreement with the data (adjusted R = 0.9113). Both models could recapitulate observed plasma concentrations after integration into the PBPK simulations. First-order and Biexponential release functionality may be useful in modeling subcutaneous LNG implants. The developed model captures central tendency of the observed data as well as variability of release kinetics. Future work focuses on incorporating various clinical scenarios into model simulations, including drug-drug interactions and a range of BMIs.

Citing Articles

Mechanistic Computational Modeling of Implantable, Bioresorbable Drug Release Systems.

Giolando P, Hopkins K, Davis B, Vike N, Ahmadzadegan A, Ardekani A Adv Mater. 2023; 35(51):e2301698.

PMID: 37243452 PMC: 10697660. DOI: 10.1002/adma.202301698.

References
1.
Lingineni K, Chaturvedula A, Cicali B, Cristofoletti R, Wendl T, Hoechel J . Determining the Exposure Threshold for Levonorgestrel Efficacy Using an Integrated Model Based Meta-Analysis Approach. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2021; 111(2):509-518. DOI: 10.1002/cpt.2457. View

2.
Dash S, Murthy P, Nath L, Chowdhury P . Kinetic modeling on drug release from controlled drug delivery systems. Acta Pol Pharm. 2010; 67(3):217-23. View

3.
Hofmann B, Apter D, Bitzer J, Reinecke I, Serrani M, Hochel J . Comparative pharmacokinetic analysis of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine systems and levonorgestrel-containing contraceptives with oral or subdermal administration route. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2020; 25(6):417-426. DOI: 10.1080/13625187.2020.1815008. View

4.
Sivin I, Lahteenmaki P, Ranta S, Darney P, Klaisle C, Wan L . Levonorgestrel concentrations during use of levonorgestrel rod (LNG ROD) implants. Contraception. 1997; 55(2):81-5. DOI: 10.1016/s0010-7824(96)00276-4. View

5.
Callahan R, Taylor D, Jenkins D, Owen D, Cheng L, Cancel A . In vivo release of levonorgestrel from Sino-implant (II) — an innovative comparison of explant data. Contraception. 2015; 92(4):350-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.06.028. View