» Articles » PMID: 37240877

Dental Root Injuries Caused by Osteosynthesis Screws in Orthognathic Surgery-Comparison of Conventional Osteosynthesis and Osteosynthesis by CAD/CAM Drill Guides and Patient-Specific Implants

Overview
Journal J Pers Med
Date 2023 May 27
PMID 37240877
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background/aim: The primary aim was to evaluate the prevalence and localisation of dental injuries caused by osteosynthesis screws during orthognathic surgery, comparing two different CAD/CAM planning/surgical approaches through retrospective evaluation of post-operative computed tomography.

Material And Methods: This study considered all patients who underwent orthognathic surgery from 2010-2019. The examination for dental root injuries between conventional osteosynthesis (Maxilla conventional cohort) and osteosynthesis with patient-specific implant (Maxilla PSI cohort) was performed by evaluating the post-operative CT scans.

Results: A total of 126 patients were included in the study. Among the 61 patients of the Maxilla conventional cohort, 10 dental root injuries in 8 patients (13.1%) were detected in the post-operative CT scan, representing 1.5% ( = 10/651) of the osteosynthesis screws inserted in proximity of the alveolar crest. No dental injury occurred following osteosynthesis in the 65 patients of the Maxillary PSI cohort ( = 0/773 screws) ( < 0.001). During a mean follow-up period of 13 months after primary surgery, none of the injured teeth showed evidence of periapical alterations and no endodontic treatments were necessary.

Conclusions: Maxillary positioning using CAD/CAM-fabricated drill/osteotomy guide and osteosynthesis with PSI can significantly reduce the risk for dental injury compared to the conventional procedure. However, the clinical significance of the detected dental injuries was rather minor.

Citing Articles

Hanna's Modified Sagittal Split Osteotomy (HSSO): An Alternative to Inverted L Osteotomy-Merging Function and Aesthetics for Enhanced Stability, Attractiveness, and Nerve Protection.

Hanna T, Bansal K, Ilesan R, Buchbinder D J Clin Med. 2024; 13(12).

PMID: 38929967 PMC: 11204967. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13123438.

References
1.
Deguchi T, Nasu M, Murakami K, Yabuuchi T, Kamioka H, Takano-Yamamoto T . Quantitative evaluation of cortical bone thickness with computed tomographic scanning for orthodontic implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006; 129(6):721.e7-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.02.026. View

2.
Cornelius C, Ehrenfeld M . The Use of MMF Screws: Surgical Technique, Indications, Contraindications, and Common Problems in Review of the Literature. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2011; 3(2):55-80. PMC: 3052677. DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1254376. View

3.
Shaheen E, Sun Y, Jacobs R, Politis C . Three-dimensional printed final occlusal splint for orthognathic surgery: design and validation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016; 46(1):67-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2016.10.002. View

4.
Lim G, Kim K, Park W, Jung B, Pang N . Endodontic and surgical treatment of root damage caused by orthodontic miniscrew placement. J Endod. 2013; 39(8):1073-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.04.037. View

5.
Driemel O, Staudenmaier R, Buch R, Schusselbauer U, Wagener H, Reichert T . [Dental injuries due to miniplate osteosynthesis. Classification, treatment management, complications, and prognosis]. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir. 2005; 9(5):330-5. DOI: 10.1007/s10006-005-0638-0. View