» Articles » PMID: 27428909

Improved Virtual Planning for Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery

Overview
Date 2016 Jul 19
PMID 27428909
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Conventional model surgery planning for bimaxillary orthognathic surgery can be laborious, time-consuming and may contain potential errors; hence three-dimensional (3D) virtual orthognathic planning has been proven to be an efficient, reliable, and cost-effective alternative. In this report, the 3D planning is described for a patient presenting with a Class III incisor relationship on a Skeletal III base with pan facial asymmetry complicated by reverse overjet and anterior open bite. A combined scan data of direct cone beam computer tomography and indirect dental scan were used in the planning. Additionally, a new method of establishing optimum intercuspation by scanning dental casts in final occlusion and positioning it to the composite-scans model was shown. Furthermore, conventional model surgery planning was carried out following in-house protocol. Intermediate and final intermaxillary splints were produced following the conventional method and 3D printing. Three-dimensional planning showed great accuracy and treatment outcome and reduced laboratory time in comparison with the conventional method. Establishing the final dental occlusion on casts and integrating it in final 3D planning enabled us to achieve the best possible intercuspation.

Citing Articles

Accuracy of 3D Virtual Surgical Planning Compared to the Traditional Two-Dimensional Method in Orthognathic Surgery: A Literature Review.

Shalabi M, Darwich K, Kheshfeh M, Hajeer M Cureus. 2024; 16(11):e73477.

PMID: 39529924 PMC: 11554385. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.73477.


Dental Root Injuries Caused by Osteosynthesis Screws in Orthognathic Surgery-Comparison of Conventional Osteosynthesis and Osteosynthesis by CAD/CAM Drill Guides and Patient-Specific Implants.

Pietzka S, Fink J, Winter K, Wilde F, Schramm A, Ebeling M J Pers Med. 2023; 13(5).

PMID: 37240877 PMC: 10221129. DOI: 10.3390/jpm13050706.


Laboratorial Comparative Study of the Accuracy Between Virtual Planning and Erickson's Platform.

de Barros Melo M, do Vale Pereira I, Sverzut A, Sverzut C, Trivellato A J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2022; 21(2):493-500.

PMID: 35712388 PMC: 9192866. DOI: 10.1007/s12663-022-01687-5.


Clinical Accuracy of 3D-Planned Maxillary Positioning Using CAD/CAM-Generated Splints in Combination With Temporary Mandibular Fixation in Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery.

Pietzka S, Mascha F, Winter K, Kammerer P, Sakkas A, Schramm A Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2021; 13(4):290-299.

PMID: 33456700 PMC: 7797983. DOI: 10.1177/1943387520949348.


Accuracy of triangular meshes of stone models created from DICOM cone beam CT data.

Apostolakis D, Michelinakis G, Kourakis G, Pavlakis E Int J Implant Dent. 2019; 5(1):20.

PMID: 31065883 PMC: 6504984. DOI: 10.1186/s40729-019-0171-9.