» Articles » PMID: 37238065

Alternative Culture Systems for Bovine Oocyte In Vitro Maturation: Liquid Marbles and Differentially Shaped 96-Well Plates

Overview
Journal Animals (Basel)
Date 2023 May 27
PMID 37238065
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In vivo-matured oocytes exhibit higher developmental competence than those matured in vitro but mimicking the in vivo environment by in vitro conditions has been challenging. Until now, conventional two-dimensional (2D) systems have been used for in vitro maturation of bovine cumulus-oocytes-complexes (COCs). However, using such systems present certain limitations. Therefore, alternative low-cost methodologies may help to optimize oocyte in vitro maturation. Here, we used two different systems to culture COCs and evaluate their potential influence on embryo development and quality. In the first system, we used treated fumed silica particles to create a 3D microenvironment (liquid marbles; LM) to mature COCs. In the second system, we cultured COCs in 96-well plates with different dimensions (flat, ultra-low attachment round-bottom, and v-shaped 96-well plates). In both systems, the nuclear maturation rate remained similar to the control in 2D, showing that most oocytes reached metaphase II. However, the subsequent blastocyst rate remained lower in the liquid marble system compared with the 96-well plates and control 2D systems. Interestingly, a lower total cell number was found in the resulting embryos from both systems (LM and 96-well plates) compared with the control. In conclusion, oocytes matured in liquid marbles or 96-well plates showed no remarkable change in terms of meiotic resumption. None of the surface geometries influenced embryo development while oocyte maturation in liquid marbles led to reduced embryo development. These findings show that different geometry during maturation did not have a large impact on oocyte and embryo development. Lower embryo production after in vitro maturation in liquid marbles was probably detected because in vitro maturation was performed in serum-free medium, which makes oocytes more sensitive to possible toxic effects from the environment.

Citing Articles

Effects of Follicular Fluid and Serum Supplementation on Cumulus Cell Expansion and Nuclear Progression of Guinea Pig Oocytes, Using a Baseline Medium Established with Bovine Oocytes.

Samaniego J, Pesantez J, Ayala L, Perea F, Galarza D, Dutan J Animals (Basel). 2025; 15(5).

PMID: 40075949 PMC: 11899534. DOI: 10.3390/ani15050666.


The Effects of Endometrial Mesenchymal Stem Cells on The Maturation of Germinal Vesicle Oocytes in Hanging Drop and Sodium Alginate Hydrogel Co-Culture Systems.

Bagheri M, Rezazadeh Valojerdi M, Salehnia M Int J Fertil Steril. 2024; 18(3):278-285.

PMID: 38973282 PMC: 11245584. DOI: 10.22074/ijfs.2023.2006017.1487.

References
1.
Vadivelu R, Ooi C, Yao R, Tello Velasquez J, Pastrana E, Diaz-Nido J . Generation of three-dimensional multiple spheroid model of olfactory ensheathing cells using floating liquid marbles. Sci Rep. 2015; 5:15083. PMC: 4604460. DOI: 10.1038/srep15083. View

2.
Bell S, Mavila A, Salazar R, Bayless K, Kanagala S, Maxwell S . Differential gene expression during capillary morphogenesis in 3D collagen matrices: regulated expression of genes involved in basement membrane matrix assembly, cell cycle progression, cellular differentiation and G-protein signaling. J Cell Sci. 2001; 114(Pt 15):2755-73. DOI: 10.1242/jcs.114.15.2755. View

3.
Ledda S, Idda A, Kelly J, Ariu F, Bogliolo L, Bebbere D . A novel technique for in vitro maturation of sheep oocytes in a liquid marble microbioreactor. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016; 33(4):513-8. PMC: 4818634. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-016-0666-8. View

4.
Bebbere D, Nieddu S, Ariu F, Piras D, Ledda S . 3D Liquid Marble Microbioreactors Support Maturation of Prepubertal Ovine Oocytes and Affect Expression of Oocyte-Specific Factors. Biology (Basel). 2021; 10(11). PMC: 8614943. DOI: 10.3390/biology10111101. View

5.
Weng L . IVF-on-a-Chip: Recent Advances in Microfluidics Technology for In Vitro Fertilization. SLAS Technol. 2019; 24(4):373-385. DOI: 10.1177/2472630319851765. View