» Articles » PMID: 37237462

Identification of Prominent Genes Between 3D Glioblastoma Models and Clinical Samples Via GEO/TCGA/CGGA Data Analysis

Overview
Journal Biology (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biology
Date 2023 May 27
PMID 37237462
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A paradigm shift in preclinical evaluations of new anticancer GBM drugs should occur in favour of 3D cultures. This study leveraged the vast genomic data banks to investigate the suitability of 3D cultures as cell-based models for GBM. We hypothesised that correlating genes that are highly upregulated in 3D GBM models will have an impact in GBM patients, which will support 3D cultures as more reliable preclinical models for GBM. Using clinical samples of brain tissue from healthy individuals and GBM patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas (CGGA), and Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) databases, several genes related to pathways such as epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT)-related genes (, , , , , ), angiogenesis/migration-related genes (, , , ), hypoxia-related genes (, ), stemness-related genes (, , , ), and genes involved in the Wnt signalling pathway (, ) were found to be upregulated in brain samples from GBM patients, and the expression of these genes were also enhanced in 3D GBM cells. Additionally, EMT-related genes were upregulated in GBM archetypes (wild-type ) that historically have poorer treatment responses, with said genes being significant predictors of poorer survival in the TCGA cohort. These findings reinforced the hypothesis that 3D GBM cultures can be used as reliable models to study increased epithelial-to-mesenchymal transitions in clinical GBM samples.

References
1.
Liang H, Chen G, Li J, Yang F . Snail expression contributes to temozolomide resistance in glioblastoma. Am J Transl Res. 2019; 11(7):4277-4289. PMC: 6684932. View

2.
Tompa M, Kalovits F, Nagy A, Kalman B . Contribution of the Wnt Pathway to Defining Biology of Glioblastoma. Neuromolecular Med. 2018; 20(4):437-451. DOI: 10.1007/s12017-018-8514-x. View

3.
Labussiere M, Sanson M, Idbaih A, Delattre J . IDH1 gene mutations: a new paradigm in glioma prognosis and therapy?. Oncologist. 2010; 15(2):196-9. PMC: 3227941. DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2009-0218. View

4.
Zhang K, Liu X, Li G, Chang X, Li S, Chen J . Clinical management and survival outcomes of patients with different molecular subtypes of diffuse gliomas in China (2011-2017): a multicenter retrospective study from CGGA. Cancer Biol Med. 2022; 19(10). PMC: 9630520. DOI: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2022.0469. View

5.
Love M, Huber W, Anders S . Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014; 15(12):550. PMC: 4302049. DOI: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8. View