» Articles » PMID: 30002710

2D and 3D Cell Cultures - a Comparison of Different Types of Cancer Cell Cultures

Overview
Journal Arch Med Sci
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2018 Jul 14
PMID 30002710
Citations 615
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cell culture is a widely used tool for improving our understanding of cell biology, tissue morphology, and mechanisms of diseases, drug action, protein production and the development of tissue engineering. Most research regarding cancer biology is based on experiments using two-dimensional (2D) cell cultures . However, 2D cultures have many limitations, such as the disturbance of interactions between the cellular and extracellular environments, changes in cell morphology, polarity, and method of division. These disadvantages led to the creation of models which are more closely able to mimic conditions . One such method is three-dimensional culture (3D). Optimisation of the culture conditions may allow for a better understanding of cancer biology and facilitate the study of biomarkers and targeting therapies. In this review, we compare 2D and 3D cultures as well as different versions of 3D cultures.

Citing Articles

Computational and experimental advances in liver-on-a-chip technology for cancer research: a systematic review.

Carvalho V, Ferreira M, Rodrigues R, Teixeira S, Lima R Biophys Rev. 2025; 17(1):151-167.

PMID: 40060016 PMC: 11885749. DOI: 10.1007/s12551-024-01260-z.


Cell culture in salivary gland tumor research: molecular insights of pathogenic targets and personalized medicine.

Goncalves M, Lavareze L, Egal E, Altemani A, Mariano F Cytotechnology. 2025; 77(2):70.

PMID: 40028370 PMC: 11868036. DOI: 10.1007/s10616-025-00726-6.


3D bioprinting for the construction of drug testing models-development strategies and regulatory concerns.

Mallya D, Gadre M, Varadharajan S, Vasanthan K Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2025; 13:1457872.

PMID: 40028291 PMC: 11868281. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1457872.


Evaluation of Drug Permeation Enhancement by Using In Vitro and Ex Vivo Models.

Steyn J, Haasbroek-Pheiffer A, Pheiffer W, Weyers M, van Niekerk S, Hamman J Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2025; 18(2).

PMID: 40006008 PMC: 11859300. DOI: 10.3390/ph18020195.


Antitumor Potential of Different Treatment Approaches Using Cold Atmospheric Pressure Plasma on Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Models: In Vitro Study.

Pavlovic O, Lazarevic M, Jakovljevic A, Skoro N, Puac N, Mojsilovic S Biomedicines. 2025; 13(2).

PMID: 40002856 PMC: 11853493. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines13020443.


References
1.
Cawkill D, Eaglestone S . Evolution of cell-based reagent provision. Drug Discov Today. 2007; 12(19-20):820-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2007.08.014. View

2.
Goers L, Freemont P, Polizzi K . Co-culture systems and technologies: taking synthetic biology to the next level. J R Soc Interface. 2014; 11(96). PMC: 4032528. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2014.0065. View

3.
Marushima H, Shibata S, Asakura T, Matsuura T, Maehashi H, Ishii Y . Three-dimensional culture promotes reconstitution of the tumor-specific hypoxic microenvironment under TGFβ stimulation. Int J Oncol. 2011; 39(5):1327-36. DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2011.1142. View

4.
Polson A, Fuji R . The successes and limitations of preclinical studies in predicting the pharmacodynamics and safety of cell-surface-targeted biological agents in patients. Br J Pharmacol. 2012; 166(5):1600-2. PMC: 3419903. DOI: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2012.01916.x. View

5.
Benya P, SHAFFER J . Dedifferentiated chondrocytes reexpress the differentiated collagen phenotype when cultured in agarose gels. Cell. 1982; 30(1):215-24. DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(82)90027-7. View