» Articles » PMID: 37232493

Perceived Barriers to Cervical Cancer Screening and Motivators for At-home Human Papillomavirus Self-sampling During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Results from a Telephone Survey

Overview
Journal Elife
Specialty Biology
Date 2023 May 26
PMID 37232493
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Home-based self-sampling for human papillomavirus (HPV) testing may be an alternative for women not attending clinic-based cervical cancer screening.

Methods: We assessed barriers to care and motivators to use at-home HPV self-sampling kits during the COVID-19 pandemic as part of a randomized controlled trial evaluating kit effectiveness. Participants were women aged 30-65 and under-screened for cervical cancer in a safety-net healthcare system. We conducted telephone surveys in English/Spanish among a subgroup of trial participants, assessed differences between groups, and determined statistical significance at p<0.05.

Results: Over half of 233 survey participants reported that clinic-based screening (Pap) is uncomfortable (67.8%), embarrassing (52.4%), and discomfort seeing male providers (63.1%). The last two factors were significantly more prevalent among Spanish vs English speakers (66.4% vs 30% (p=0.000) and 69.9 vs 52.2% (p=0.006), respectively). Most women who completed the kit found Pap more embarrassing (69.3%), stressful (55.6%), and less convenient (55.6%) than the kit. The first factor was more prevalent among Spanish vs English speakers (79.6% vs 53.38%, p=0.001) and among patients with elementary education or below.

Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic influenced most (59.5%) to participate in the trial due to fear of COVID, difficulty making appointments, and ease of using kits. HPV self-sampling kits may reduce barriers among under-screened women in a safety-net system.

Funding: This study is supported by a grant from the National Institute for Minority Health and Health Disparitie s (NIMHD, R01MD013715, PI: JR Montealegre).

Clinical Trial Number: NCT03898167.

Citing Articles

HPV Self-Sampling for Cervical Cancer Screening in Under-Screened Saskatchewan Populations: A Pilot Study.

Vink E, Antaya G, Hamula C, Holinaty C, Minion J, Pond G Curr Oncol. 2024; 31(8):4261-4269.

PMID: 39195300 PMC: 11352920. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31080317.


Preventive Service Usage and New Chronic Disease Diagnoses: Using PCORnet Data to Identify Emerging Trends, United States, 2018-2022.

Jackson S, Lekiachvili A, Block J, Richards T, Nagavedu K, Draper C Prev Chronic Dis. 2024; 21:E49.

PMID: 38959375 PMC: 11230521. DOI: 10.5888/pcd21.230415.


Cost-utility and budget impact analyses of cervical cancer screening using self-collected samples for HPV DNA testing in Thailand.

Kositamongkol C, Kanchanasurakit S, Mepramoon E, Talungchit P, Chaopotong P, Kengkla K BMC Public Health. 2023; 23(1):2413.

PMID: 38049773 PMC: 10696797. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-17358-0.

References
1.
Wright A, Salazar A, Mirica M, Volk L, Schiff G . The Invisible Epidemic: Neglected Chronic Disease Management During COVID-19. J Gen Intern Med. 2020; 35(9):2816-2817. PMC: 7359916. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-020-06025-4. View

2.
Byrd T, Chavez R, Wilson K . Barriers and facilitators of cervical cancer screening among Hispanic women. Ethn Dis. 2007; 17(1):129-34. View

3.
Musa J, Achenbach C, ODwyer L, Evans C, McHugh M, Hou L . Effect of cervical cancer education and provider recommendation for screening on screening rates: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017; 12(9):e0183924. PMC: 5584806. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183924. View

4.
Fisher-Borne M, Isher-Witt J, Comstock S, Perkins R . Understanding COVID-19 impact on cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer screening among federally qualified healthcare centers participating in "Back on track with screening" quality improvement projects. Prev Med. 2021; 151:106681. PMC: 8241686. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106681. View

5.
Nelson E, Maynard B, Loux T, Fatla J, Gordon R, Arnold L . The acceptability of self-sampled screening for HPV DNA: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sex Transm Infect. 2017; 93(1):56-61. DOI: 10.1136/sextrans-2016-052609. View