» Articles » PMID: 33388330

Cervical Cancer Screening in the United States: Challenges and Potential Solutions for Underscreened Groups

Overview
Journal Prev Med
Specialty Public Health
Date 2021 Jan 3
PMID 33388330
Citations 68
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cervical cancer screening rates in the United States are generally high, yet certain groups demonstrate disparities in screening and surveillance. Individuals at greatest risk for cervical cancer are often from marginalized or underserved groups who do not participate in regular screening for a variety of reasons. Using the Population-based Research to Optimize the Screening Process (PROSPR) Trans-Organ Conceptual Model, including concepts of individual-, provider-, facility-, system-, or policy-level factors, we provide a commentary to highlight reasons for low screening participation among subgroups in the U.S. These include racial and ethnic minorities, rural residents, sexual and gender minorities, those with limited English proficiency, those with particular religious beliefs, and various health conditions. We describe barriers and offer potential solutions for each group. In addition, we discuss cross-cutting barriers to screening including difficulty interacting with the healthcare system (limited knowledge and health literacy, lack of provider recommendation/contact), financial (cost, lack of insurance), and logistical barriers (e.g., lack of usual source of care, competing demands, scheduling issues). Solutions to address these barriers are needed to improve screening rates across all underscreened groups. Changes at state and national policy levels are needed to address health insurance coverage. Mobile screening, ensuring that interpreters are available for all visits, and targeted in reach at non-gynecological visits can further overcome barriers. Employing community outreach workers can increase community demand for screening, and patient navigators can improve adherence to both screening and follow-up diagnostic evaluation. HPV self-sampling can address multiple barriers to cervical cancer screening.

Citing Articles

Perceptions, Experiences, and Beliefs About Patient Portals Among Women With Limited English Proficiency: Multicultural Qualitative Interview Study.

Han H, Chepkorir J, Kim T, Zamora M, Huang E J Med Internet Res. 2025; 27:e60699.

PMID: 40009438 PMC: 11904362. DOI: 10.2196/60699.


Challenges in Providing Gynecological Procedures in Primary Care: A Survey of Canadian Academic Family Physicians.

Rezaiefar P, Archibald D, Kabir M, Humphrey-Murto S Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2025; 6(1):102-112.

PMID: 39989871 PMC: 11839541. DOI: 10.1089/whr.2024.0098.


Ethnic/Racial Disparities in Pancreatic Cancer Mortality Across the United States: A National Inpatient Sample Database Analysis.

Fuko C, Magacha H, Noah G, Ikwuka O Cureus. 2025; 17(1):e77389.

PMID: 39949443 PMC: 11821361. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.77389.


A Global Survey of Self-Reported Cancer Screening Practices by Health Professionals for Kidney Transplant Candidates and Recipients.

Saleem N, Lim W, Stephens J, Wilson A, Bonevski B, Jaure A Transpl Int. 2025; 37:13965.

PMID: 39901917 PMC: 11788010. DOI: 10.3389/ti.2024.13965.


How can cervical screening meet the needs of vulnerable women? A qualitative comparative study with stakeholder perspectives from seven European countries.

Boje R, Bardou M, Mensah K, Rico Berrocal R, Bonvicini L, Iorio G BMJ Open. 2025; 15(1):e090631.

PMID: 39863407 PMC: 11784119. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090631.