» Articles » PMID: 37216561

Quantification of Gallium Cryo-FIB Milling Damage in Biological Lamellae

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2023 May 22
PMID 37216561
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM) can reveal the molecular details of biological processes in their native, cellular environment at atomic resolution. However, few cells are sufficiently thin to permit imaging with cryo-EM. Thinning of frozen cells to <500 nm lamellae by focused-ion-beam (FIB) milling has enabled visualization of cellular structures with cryo-EM. FIB milling represents a significant advance over prior approaches because of its ease of use, scalability, and lack of large-scale sample distortions. However, the amount of damage it causes to a thinned cell section has not yet been determined. We recently described an approach for detecting and identifying single molecules in cryo-EM images of cells using 2D template matching (2DTM). 2DTM is sensitive to small differences between a molecular model (template) and the detected structure (target). Here, we use 2DTM to demonstrate that under the standard conditions used for machining lamellae of biological samples, FIB milling introduces a layer of variable damage that extends to a depth of 60 nm from each lamella surface. This layer of damage limits the recovery of information for in situ structural biology. We find that the mechanism of FIB milling damage is distinct from radiation damage during cryo-EM imaging. By accounting for both electron scattering and FIB milling damage, we estimate that FIB milling damage with current protocols will negate the potential improvements from lamella thinning beyond 90 nm.

Citing Articles

Xenon plasma focused ion beam lamella fabrication on high-pressure frozen specimens for structural cell biology.

Berger C, Watson H, Naismith J, Dumoux M, Grange M Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):2286.

PMID: 40055361 PMC: 11889171. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-57493-3.


Cryo-electron tomography pipeline for plasma membranes.

Sun W, Michalak D, Sochacki K, Kunamaneni P, Alfonzo-Mendez M, Arnold A Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):855.

PMID: 39833141 PMC: 11747107. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-56045-z.


A new statistical metric for robust target detection in cryo-EM using 2D template matching.

Zhang K, Cossio P, Rangan A, Lucas B, Grigorieff N IUCrJ. 2025; 12(Pt 2):155-176.

PMID: 39819740 PMC: 11878444. DOI: 10.1107/S2052252524011771.


Structural biology inside multicellular specimens using electron cryotomography.

Caspy I, Wang Z, Bharat T Q Rev Biophys. 2025; 58:e6.

PMID: 39801355 PMC: 7617309. DOI: 10.1017/S0033583525000010.


CTFFIND5 provides improved insight into quality, tilt, and thickness of TEM samples.

Elferich J, Kong L, Zottig X, Grigorieff N Elife. 2024; 13.

PMID: 39704651 PMC: 11661789. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.97227.


References
1.
Tang G, Peng L, Baldwin P, Mann D, Jiang W, Rees I . EMAN2: an extensible image processing suite for electron microscopy. J Struct Biol. 2006; 157(1):38-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2006.05.009. View

2.
Rohou A, Grigorieff N . CTFFIND4: Fast and accurate defocus estimation from electron micrographs. J Struct Biol. 2015; 192(2):216-21. PMC: 6760662. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2015.08.008. View

3.
Elferich J, Schiroli G, Scadden D, Grigorieff N . Defocus Corrected Large Area Cryo-EM (DeCo-LACE) for label-free detection of molecules across entire cell sections. Elife. 2022; 11. PMC: 9711527. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.80980. View

4.
Rickgauer J, Grigorieff N, Denk W . Single-protein detection in crowded molecular environments in cryo-EM images. Elife. 2017; 6. PMC: 5453696. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.25648. View

5.
Al-Amoudi A, Studer D, Dubochet J . Cutting artefacts and cutting process in vitreous sections for cryo-electron microscopy. J Struct Biol. 2005; 150(1):109-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2005.01.003. View